What caused so many banks to fail

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Explanation:

The most common cause of bank failure occurs when the value of the bank's assets falls to below the market value of the bank's liabilities, which are the bank's obligations to creditors and depositors. This might happen because the bank loses too much on its investments.

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

They went bank rupt or not a lot of people came to there banks

Explanation:


Related Questions

What is one of the major assumptions of rational choice theory?
Describe the relationship between a Lord and a Vassal in the Middle Ages.
Which interaction BEST illustrates the concept of mutualism?A) Jaguars feeding on wild pigs. B) Squirrels playing with other squirrels. C) Malaria protozoans living on the blood of a host. D) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria in root nodules of legumes.
Which feature of the U.S. Constitution makes it adaptable to changing times?A. permitting freedom of religionB. providing for the nation's defenseC. conducting local electionsD. Passing amendments
Explain the KISS principle. Give an example of an actual situation where the KISS principle was ignored and the resulting consequences. Give an example of a real situation when the KISS principle was followed and the consequences.

Five-year-old matthew and 6-year-old jessica like to pretend that they live or work in a zoo. often, matthew will pretend to be an animal, such as an elephant and jessica will pretend to be the zookeeper. this is an example of __________ play. a)parallel b)associative c)sociodramatic d)functional

Answers

Answer= C. SOCIODRAMATIC PLAY

Dramatic play can be defined as a type of play were children accept and assign roles and then act them out. Children imitate actions and speech from earlier observed situations. They pretend to be someone or something different from themselves, and dramatize situations and actions to go along with the rolls the chose to play.

When another person becomes involved in the play, it is called Sociodramatic play.

What conclusion does this image best support?

Answers

answer:

what image?

explanation:

there is no image

Retrospective voting posits that______________________________________.a. when a particular issue captures the attention of many people in the electorate, voters are more likely to use a candidate's position on that issue to form a vote decision
b. in making a choice, voters do not take into consideration the past career of the candidate
c. issue voting occurs more often when an issue is of particular personal concern to a voter
d. candidates who have more favorable images than their opponents among voters tend to fare much better in election contests
e. evaluation of an incumbent's past performance in office provides important cues for voters in deciding whether to vote for that candidate

Answers

Voting for or against a candidate or party in office because one likes or dislikes how things have gone in the recent past (looking back)

In the United States, how old must a person be to vote in elections?A.18
B.19
c.21
D.30

Answers

Answer:

18

In the United States,  a person must be 18 years old to vote in elections.

Answer:

18

Explanation:

Do you think it’s possible to describe (or write) a specific set of instructions that a person could follow that would always result in better text compression than your heuristic? Why or why not? Is there a way to know that a compressed piece of text is compressed the most possible? If yes, describe how you could determine it. If no, why not?

Answers

Answer:

Yes it is possible to describe such information resulting in better text compression. In addition, there is a definite way to prove a text has been compressed to the most.

Explanation:

Heuristics are basically mental shortcuts with the purpose of solving a problem the fastest way possible, even if the process itself is not optimal. Because of this, heuristics can sometimes be a bit messy. Thus, if the information presented is a written set of instructions, it would be easier to comprise such text instead of applying heuristics because it would show the same structure in a much clear and concise way.

The best way to know that a compressed piece of text is compressed the most possible if by just looking at the result, if all that is left are symbols from the original message, then it is compressed to the limit.

Are interest groups good or bad for democracy? Defend and explain your answer.

Answers

Answer:

I believe that the best answer here lies somewhere in the middle. I believe that interest groups can be beneficial for society, and democracy in general, when they seek to ensure that a government really works towards the good of all people through their lobbying actions, but they can also be a bad thing when their purposes are only to benefit the group and not society at large. For example, when you take such interest groups as workers movements, you see this middle ground. Their protests, and lobbying in Congress, have ensured that policies in favor of laborers have been passed, improved, and maintained. In this instance, interest groups have exerted a positive influence on democracy. But, when they simply start to pressure for measures that can only benefit their particular group, to the detriment of other members of society, then, they are not so good.

There is also the issue that interest groups, especially when they become pretty powerful and influential, can begin to exert too much pressure and interfere with policies that have been good for the general public, but that do not benefit their particular interests. So in this case, interest groups are not too good for democracy. However, on the other side of that same coin, interest groups that seek to pressure for the benefit of the general population, to have policies in favor of such things as healthcare, social programs, etc., can be very beneficial to democracy.

Finally, interest groups are a way in which the people in a country can have influence on their government, aside from representatives that are elected. These groups, if they have elected officials, can exert pressure so that the people´s interests, and desires, are met. It is a way to keep government balanced and within the scope of: rule for the people and by the people.

Final answer:

Interest groups can have both positive and negative impacts on democracy. They allow citizens to participate in the democratic process and advocate for their concerns, but can also exert undue influence and prioritize the interests of a wealthy minority.

Explanation:

Interest groups can have both positive and negative impacts on democracy. On one hand, they allow citizens to participate in the democratic process by advocating for their interests and concerns. Interest groups can provide valuable information to policymakers, promote public awareness and education, and help mobilize citizens to vote and engage in political activities. However, interest groups can also have a negative influence on democracy if they exert undue influence, engage in corruption or unethical practices, or disproportionately represent the interests of a wealthy minority. It is important to strike a balance between allowing interest groups to participate in democracy while maintaining transparency, accountability, and equal representation for all citizens.

Learn more about Impact of interest groups on democracy here:

brainly.com/question/32217869

#SPJ6