An individual is arrested for stealing mail from a UnitedStates Post Office located in the city of Orlando, Florida.
Which court would have original jurisdiction in this case?
Orlando City Court
Orange County Trial Court
United States District Court
Florida District Court of Appeals

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

I think its United states district court

Explanation:

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

United States District Court

Explanation:

I think it would be the United States District Court because this is the US mail we're talking about. If this was like a local UPS, FedEx, or Amazon truck it would probably be something different.


Related Questions

Your opinion on Free public transport for senior citizens.
Project: Lulu the Runaway DogProject Part A: Lulu the Runaway Dog Let's review the runaway dog example. When you see Lulu escape, you shout, "Come back, Lulu!" but Lulu the Labrador has already run through one neighbor's yard and is racing down the street. You decide that pursuing her in your fuel-efficient Focus would be the best course of action. However, you can't possibly end your phone conversation. After all, you are discussing the latest Dame Daisy video and analyzing it minute by minute. With your phone in one hand, car keys in the other, you rev up your car and head off to find Lulu. Jamie, Lulu's ten-year-old owner whom you are also babysitting, jumps in the car with you. As you are driving (a little faster than the speed limit) and talking on your phone, an annoying fly starts to buzz around your head. You shake your head and as you refocus and look ahead, there is Lulu—right in front of your car. You slam on your brakes and turn the wheels of the car sharply to the right with all your might to avoid hitting Lulu. A motorist opposite you drives onto the curb and bangs up the side of his car as he avoids hitting your vehicle. You slam into a utility pole, which was badly in need of repair, and knock it down. The pole hits a tree that smashes into a house and severely damages the front porch. Luckily, Lulu is fine. So is the motorist, who is very angry. Jamie is complaining that her wrist feels like it is all twisted. You cannot help thinking, "Oh boy, am I in trouble!" But you are "just a kid," right? Where do you start to sort out this mess? You start by contacting your cousin, Marjorie, who is a first-year law student at State University. You tell her every little detail you remember, including all events leading up to the accident. She wants to help you determine to whom you may have owed a duty of care and to whom you breached this duty. She sends you an email with the questions listed below. Please answer them. Marjorie's Questions: Who was involved in the accident? Did you owe a duty to anyone? If so, what duty or duties and to which particular individuals? Which duties did you breach? Were your actions the cause of any injuries? Were you actions an actual cause or a proximate cause, or both? For what damages could you be held liable? Are there any defenses against potential plaintiffs? If so, what are they? Provide a brief four- to five-paragraph answer. Project Part B: A Fire near Gidgits Galore Gidgits Galore borders a privately owned ten-acre forest. Pete owns the land. It is zoned "mixed," so businesses and residences can be found throughout the neighborhood. Through the forest is a multiresidence apartment building. Danny, a high-school senior who lives in one of the apartments, has crammed all night for his economics final and needs a break. He has decided to take a morning walk down one of the forest's paths, prodding the piles of leaves and clumps of moss with his walking stick. He sees what appeared to be a recently-used campfire, and pokes around it with his stick. As he wanders farther, he doesn't realize that he has reignited the fire. To make matters worse, it is unexpectedly windy that day. As the wind picks up, the flames leap over 200 feet to a storage shed used by the apartment building's maintenance workers. One of them, Don, has just arrived to get his lawnmower. He calls 911. While waiting, he tries to extinguish the flames with his jacket, but he stops when his work shirt catches fire. The flames also reach the tent of Cassie, the camper who lit the campfire the previous night. Cassie thought she had extinguished the fire as she set up her tent nearby. Cassie wakes up coughing from smoke inhalation and manages to exit the tent before it is destroyed by fire. One of Gidgits Galore's managers, Dianne, arrives to open up the store but is detoured by the smoke she sees in the distance. Soon she too is overwhelmed by its acrid smell, which brings on a severe asthma attack. As quickly as the flames started, the wind stops, and they die down. Firefighters who arrive on the scene are able to quickly extinguish the fire. You are a member of a mock jury in a negligence case. As a juror, one of your duties is to find the facts from the evidence presented and determine if there is enough evidence to show that the defendant was negligent. Sort out the facts in the present case. Prepare a brief argument (three to four paragraphs) outlining why Danny could be held negligent against the potential plaintiffs listed below. Don the maintenance worker Cassie the camper Dianne the GidgitsGalore employee Pete the landowner Prepare a brief argument (two to three paragraphs) showing why Danny's conduct did not amount to negligence against any of the potential plaintiffs listed above.
What do property tax and sales tax have in common
What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?O A. Criminal lawB. Administrative lawO c. Procedural lawO D. Civil law
Question 7 of 10Which situation would allow a country to increase the goods it importsdespite spending the same amount of money?A. The country's government approved an increase in its trade deficit.B. The country's currency experienced a major decline in interestratesC. The inflation rate of the country's currency increasedD. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased

Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror. True or False

Answers

The given statement "Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror" is true.

Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror before it has been accepted by the offeree. It is important to note that an offer can only be revoked before it has been accepted. Once an offer has been accepted, it becomes a binding contract and can no longer be revoked.

There are a few exceptions to the rule that an offer can only be revoked before it has been accepted. For example, an offer can be revoked if it is made under duress or if there is a mutual mistake of fact. Additionally, an offer can be revoked if it is made to a specific person and that person dies or becomes incapacitated.

Revocation of an offer can be done verbally or in writing. However, it is important to note that the revocation must be communicated to the offeree in order to be effective. If the revocation is not communicated to the offeree, the offer remains valid and can be accepted.

For such more question on Revocation

brainly.com/question/30333513

#SPJ6

Final answer:

Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror in contract law.

Explanation:

Revocation in Contract Law

In contract law, revocation refers to the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror before it is accepted by the offeree. It is important to note that revocation can generally occur any time before acceptance, unless the offer includes an option contract or the offeror has made a firm promise to keep the offer open for a certain period.

For example, if a person offers to sell their car to another person and later changes their mind, they can revoke the offer as long as the other person has not accepted the offer yet.

Learn more about Revocation here:

brainly.com/question/30160947

#SPJ6

DNA evidence is typically easy to find at a crime scene.
True
False

Answers

DNA evidence is useful in solving crimes but it is not easy to find at crime scenes so this is false.

Why isn't DNA evidence more widely used?

Even though DNA evidence can help solve a crime faster, it is not very easy to find at crime scenes.

This is because not all can give the relevant material required for DNA testing, and there is also the issue of contamination.

Find out more on DNA evidence at brainly.com/question/17677132.

#SPJ2

Answer:

false

Explanation:

What comes before the Articles of the Constitution?​

Answers

Answer:

In terms of the order of sections in the Constitution, the Preamble comes before the Articles.

Though is you are asking what document was used in American government before the Constitution, The Articles of Confederation were used.

Explanation:

Order of the Constitution: Preamble, Article I, Article II, Article III, Article V, Article VI, and Article VII.

Before the Constitution was established in 1788, America's first attempt at a government was the adoption of the Articles of Confederation

The Preamble comes before the constitution

John owned an apartment and leased it to Steve. The lease agreement was for one year. After ten months, Steve told John that he was moving out of the apartment immediately. When John went to the apartment, he saw that Steve had put holes in the walls, ruined the carpets, and damaged the wiring. John was told that repairs would take at least two months. John sued Steve for damage to the apartment and for the rent payments for the last two months of the lease. Steve argues that the remaining rent owed should be offset by John's duty to find another tenant and mitigate his damages. The court would most likely rule in favor of(a) Steve, because John had a duty to mitigate his damages(b) John, because Steve argued against his recovery in their dispute(c) Steve, because John could have rented the apartment "as is"(d) John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to the damage

Answers

Answer:

d. John, because the apartment could not be rented for two months due to damage.

Explanation:

The main parts of a lease agreement, is the leasea term, whis generally is 1 year, and in case an early termination exist, it should let the owner know with time. Then the deposit should be specified as a security for damages or unpaid bills. In case the deposit existed then the court eill rule in favoir of Steve.

How is a MSDS used by employers to comply with government requirements

Answers

Employers use Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) to comply with government requirements related to workplace safety and hazard communication.

MSDS provides detailed information about the physical and chemical properties of hazardous substances, along with safety precautions, handling procedures, and emergency response measures.

Employers use MSDS in the following ways:

  • Hazard Communication: MSDS ensures that employees are aware of the potential hazards associated with the substances they work with, promoting safety awareness and training.
  • Risk Assessment: Employers use MSDS to assess and mitigate risks associated with hazardous materials, implementing appropriate control measures to protect workers' health and safety.
  • Emergency Preparedness: MSDS provides guidance for handling spills, leaks, fires, and other emergencies involving hazardous substances, enabling employers to develop effective emergency response plans.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Government regulations, such as OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard, require employers to maintain MSDS for hazardous substances, ensuring compliance with legal obligations.

Thus, by utilizing MSDS, employers can enhance workplace safety, prevent accidents, and fulfill their responsibilities toward employee well-being and regulatory compliance.

Learn more about Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) here:

brainly.com/question/29428036

#SPJ2

1910.1200(g)(8)

The employer shall maintain in the workplace copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and shall ensure that they are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s).

9. What ultimately happened to Clarence Earl Gideon?

Answers

Answer:

Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. ... After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court