Question 7 of 10Which situation would allow a country to increase the goods it imports
despite spending the same amount of money?
A. The country's government approved an increase in its trade deficit.
B. The country's currency experienced a major decline in interest
rates
C. The inflation rate of the country's currency increased
D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, the import increases while spending same amount.

So, option D. is correct.

Define import.

An import is a product or service purchased in one country but made in the other. Import is among the most important aspects of international trade.

If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, it would help the country to import more items while spending the very same amount of money.

So, option D. is correct.

Find out more information about import here:

brainly.com/question/14099397?referrer=searchResults

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased

Explanation:

a p e ex


Related Questions

As you approach an intersection blanks around and through the intersection for traffic controls and other road users already in the intersection
How has the supreme court’s original interpretation of the right to privacy changed because of griswold and roe?
Does mr.spock give character evidence
Why did anti-communist legislators view hollywood as a major concern?
A sample of aluminum metal has a mass of

I will give the BRAINIEST Is it enough to be suspected of terrorism , or should these suspects have the right to a fair trial before being detained indefinitely?​

Answers

Answer:

fair trial

Explanation:

because just cuz something is suspected does not mean it is true.

plz mark brainlest

What is the first thing an evidence analyst is likely to be asked in court?

Answers

Judes said he would not do it

Which of the following is an example of self-incrimination? Select all that apply.

A. An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.

B. The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”

C. Two teenagers arrested for breaking into a house for sale confirmed that they had walked by the house several times and were curious about what had been left inside after the owners moved away, but they had never satisfied their curiosity.

D. A suspect in an auto theft said that he had had always feared being accused of stealing a car after a detective told him he looked like a car thief.

Answers

Answer:

B C & D

Explanation:

All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess

Answer:

A-  The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”

D- An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.

How many witnesses are required to convict someone of treason

Answers

Answer:

Article III of the Constitution  establishes a very high bar for convicting an American for treason. However, like other aspects of the Constitution, the exact meaning of this provision is being discussed by constitutional scholars. This reads the following:

Treason against the United States shall consist solely of waging war against them, or of adhering to their enemies, providing them with assistance and comfort. No person shall be convicted of Treason except on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on the open court confession.

Explanation:

The explanation the prosecutions for treason are very rare is that the conviction requires two witnesses to the act of treason. In summary, by default, the definition of treason is quite narrow. This means that conviction for treason in American history is very difficult and therefore very rare.

Final answer:

In the United States, at least two witnesses are generally required to convict someone of treason.

Explanation:

In the United States, the number of witnesses required to convict someone of treason varies depending on the circumstances. The United States Constitution states that no person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. This means that at least two witnesses are generally required for a conviction, although the exact number can be determined by the court in specific cases.

Learn more about witnesses required for treason conviction here:

brainly.com/question/38086

#SPJ6

Roles of ethics on the national development show citation per page three page ​

Answers

The roles of ethic are not going to happen in the front of us.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of selecting judges through popular elections? Can a judge who considers herself or himself a Republican or a Democrat render fair and impartial justice?

Answers

I believe it is irresponsible to elect anyone by a popular vote. To ensure that it is fair and has not been slashed or meddled with, they should employ the electoral college.

Why are judges appointed and not elected by the people?

All Justices hold their positions for life and are chosen by the President, who also proposes them to the Senate for confirmation. Justices are regarded as being shielded from political pressure while making decisions because they are not required to run for re-election or engage in re-election campaigns. Unless they retire, pass away, are impeached and found guilty by Congress, or resign themselves, justices may continue to serve.

The majority of the cases the Court hears are appealed, and because the Court is the last legal arbitrator of federal law issues in the United States, its rulings are final and cannot be appealed to any other body. The Court may, however, take into account appeals from the top state courts or from federal appellate courts. Notwithstanding the fact that every legal issue may be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Learn more about judges here:

brainly.com/question/1030749

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think that electing anyone through popular vote is not smart. They should use the electoral college to make sure it's unbaised and not hacked or medled in.

Explanation: