How can scientific method solve real world problems examples

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The scientific method is nothing more than a process for discovering answers. While the name refers to “science,” this method of problem solving can be used for any type of problem

Related Questions

The unit of electric potential or electromotive force is the
A uniform, 4.5 kg, square, solid wooden gate 1.5 m on each side hangs vertically from a frictionless pivot at the center of its upper edge. A 1.3 kg raven flying horizontally at 4.5 m/s flies into this door at its center and bounces back at 2.5 m/s in the opposite direction. (a) What is the angular speed of the gate just after it is struck by the unfortunate raven? (b) During the collision, why is the angular momentum conserved but not the linear momentum?
Draw a ray diagram for an object placed more than two focal lengths in front of a converging lens.
Much of our knowledge of the interior of the Earth comes from the study of planetary vibrations, which is the science of
Consider three drinking glasses. All three have the same area base, and all three are filled to the same depth with water. Glass A is cylindrical. Glass B is wider at the top than at the bottom, and so holds more water than A. Glass C is narrower at the top than at the bottom, and so holds less water than A. In which glass is the pressure on the base greatest liquid pressure at the bottom?a. Glass Ab. Glass Bc. Glass Cd. All three have equal non-zero pressure at the bottom.e. All three have zero pressure at the bottom.

A periodic wave travels from one medium to another. Which pair of variables are likely to change in the process? A. velocity and wavelength B. velocity and frequency C. frequency and wavelength D. frequency and phase E. wavelength and phase

Answers

Answer:

A. velocity and wavelength

Explanation:

When a wave travels from one medium to another it undergoes refraction which results to the change in direction.

Refraction of a wave is one of the property of waves that occurs when a wave changes direction when it passes from one medium to another. This occurs as a result of bending of the wave which occurs since the mediums involved are of different density and refractive index.

Apart from the change in direction, refraction is accompanied by the change in wavelength of a wave and thus a change in speed.

Answer:

A. velocity and wavelength

Explanation:

Since the density of air decreases with an increase in temperature, but the bulk modulus B is nearly independent of temperature, how would you expect the speed of sound waves in air to vary with temperature?

Answers

To develop this problem it is necessary to apply the concept related to the speed of sound waves in fluids.

By definition we know that the speed would be given by

v=\sqrt{(\beta)/(\rho)}

\beta = Bulk modulus

\rho =Density of air

From the expression shown above we can realize that the speed of sound is inversely proportional to the fluid in which it is found, in this case the air. When the density increases, the speed of sound decreases and vice versa.

According to the statement then, if the density of the air decreases due to an increase in temperature, we can conclude that the speed of sound increases when the temperature increases. They are directly proportional.

An airplane with a speed of 92.3 m/s is climbing upward at an angle of 51.1 ° with respect to the horizontal. When the plane's altitude is 532 m, the pilot releases a package. (a) Calculate the distance along the ground, measured from a point directly beneath the point of release, to where the package hits the earth.
(b) Relative to the ground, determine the angle of the velocity vector of the package just before impact. (a) Number Units (b) Number Units

Answers

Answer:

a

D =  1162.7 \  m

b

\beta =- 65.55^o

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The speed of the airplane is  u  =  92.3 \ m/s

   The  angle is  \theta = 51.1^o

    The altitude of the plane is  d =  532 \  m

Generally the y-component of the airplanes velocity is  

       u_y  =  v *  sin (\theta )

=>     u_y  =   92.3 *  sin ( 51.1 )

=>     u_y  =  71.83  \ m/s

Generally the displacement  traveled by the package in the vertical direction is

       d =  (u_y)t +  (1)/(2)(-g)t^2

=>       -532  = 71.83 t +  (1)/(2)(-9.8)t^2

Here the negative sign for the distance show that the direction is along the negative y-axis

 =>   4.9t^2 - 71.83t - 532 = 0

Solving this using quadratic formula we obtain that

    t =  20.06 \  s

Generally the x-component of the velocity is  

     u_x  =  u  *  cos (\theta)

=>    u_x  =   92.3  *  cos (51.1)

=>   u_x  =   57.96 \ m/s

Generally the distance travel in the horizontal  direction is    

     D =  u_x  *  t

=>   D =  57.96  *   20.06

=>    D =  1162.7 \  m

Generally the angle of the velocity vector relative to the ground is mathematically represented as

       \beta  =  tan ^(-1)[(v_y)/(v_x ) ]

Here v_y is the final  velocity of the package along the vertical  axis and this is mathematically represented as  

     v_y  =  u_y  -   gt

=>  v_y  =  71.83  -    9.8 *  20.06

=>  v_y  =  -130.05 \  m/s  

and  v_x is the final  velocity of the package which is equivalent to the initial velocity u_x

So

       \beta  =  tan ^(-1)[-130.05}{57.96 } ]

       \beta =- 65.55^o

The negative direction show that it is moving towards the south east direction

   

The interatomic spring stiffness for tungsten is determined from Young's modulus measurements to be 90 N/m. The mass of one mole of tungsten is 0.185 kg. If we model a block of tungsten as a collection of atomic "oscillators" (masses on springs), what is one quantum of energy for one of these atomic oscillators? Note that since each oscillator is attached to two "springs", and each "spring" is half the length of the interatomic bond, the effective interatomic spring stiffness for one of these oscillators is 4 times the calculated value given above. Use these precise values for the constants: ℏ = 1.0546 10-34 J · s (Planck's constant divided by 2π) Avogadro's number = 6.0221 1023 molecules/mole kB = 1.3807 10-23 J/K (the Boltzmann constant)

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

solution below

Final answer:

The quantum of energy for one atomic oscillator in tungsten, given the effective interatomic spring stiffness of 360 N/m, the mass of one tungsten atom as 3.074 x 10^-25 kg, and the reduced Planck's constant of 1.0546 x 10^-34 J · s, can be calculated to be approximately 1.33 x 10^-21 J.

Explanation:

To calculate the quantum of energy for one atomic oscillator in tungsten, we will consider the model of an atom being connected to two springs, both having an effective interatomic spring stiffness of four times the given value (90 N/m). This value thus becomes 360 N/m.

One mole of tungsten has a mass of 0.185 kg, thus the mass of one atom can be determined by dividing this value by Avogadro's number (6.0221 x 10^23 molecules/mole), which gives approximately 3.074 x 10^-25 kg.

The quantum of energy, or the energy of one quantum (the smallest possible energy increment), is given by the formula E = ħω, where ħ is the reduced Planck's constant (1.0546 x 10^-34 J · s) and ω is the angular frequency, given by sqrt(k/m), where k is the spring constant and m is the mass.

Substituting the known values into these equations gives ω= sqrt((360)/(3.074 x 10^-25)) and E= (1.0546 x 10^-34) x sqrt((360)/(3.074 x 10^-25)), which results in a quantum of energy of approximately 1.33 x 10^-21 J.

Learn more about Quantum Energy here:

brainly.com/question/28175160

#SPJ3

An emf is induced by rotating a 1207 turn, 20.0 cm diameter coil in the Earth's 4.13 10-5 T magnetic field. What average emf is induced, given the plane of the coil is originally perpendicular to the Earth's field and is rotated to be parallel to the field in 10.0 ms

Answers

Answer:

0.157 V

Explanation:

Parameters given:

Number of turns, N = 1207

Diameter of coil = 20 cm = 0.2 m

Radius of coil, r = 0.2/2 = 0.1 m

Magnetic field strength, B = 4.13 * 10^(-5) T

Time interval, t = 10 ms = 10 * 10^(-3) = 0.01 s

The average EMF induced in a coil due to a magnetic field is given as:

EMF = (- N * A * B)/(t)

where A = Area of coil

A = πr^(2)

Therefore, EMF will be:

EMF = (- 1207 * 3.142 * 0.1^2 * 4.13 * 10^(-5))/(0.01) \n\n\nEMF = -0.157 V\n

A space vehicle of mass m has a speed v. At some instant, it separates into two pieces, each of mass 0.5m. One of the pieces is at rest just after the separation. How much work was done by the internal forces that caused the separation

Answers

Answer:

W = ½ m v²

Explanation:

In this exercise we must solve it in parts, in a first part we use the conservation of the moment to find the speed after the separation

We define the system formed by the two parts of the rocket, therefore the forces during internal separation and the moment are conserved

initial instant. before separation

        p₀ = m v

final attempt. after separation

       p_(f) = m /2  0 + m /2 v_{f}

       p₀ = p_{f}

       m v = m /2 v_(f)

       v_{f}= 2 v

this is the speed of the second part of the ship

now we can use the relation of work and energy, which establishes that the work is initial to the variation of the kinetic energy of the body

     

initial energy

         K₀ = ½ m v²

final energy

        K_(f) = ½ m/2  0 + ½ m/2 v_{f}²

        K_{f} = ¼ m (2v)²

        K_{f} = m v²

         

the expression for work is

         W = ΔK = K_{f} - K₀

         W = m v² - ½ m v²

         W = ½ m v²

Final answer:

The principle of conservation of momentum implies that no work is performed by the internal forces during the separation of the space vehicle. This is granted that external forces are ignored and the total momentum and kinetic energy of the closed system remain constant.

Explanation:

The subject you're asking about centers around the principle of conservation of momentum. In the case of this space vehicle, before separation, the momentum of the whole system is given by the product of the mass and velocity, mv. After separation, one piece is at rest, leaving the other piece with momentum mv. As there is no external force, the total momentum does not change, so no work is performed by the internal forces causing the separation.

In more detail, the principle of conservation of momentum states that the total linear momentum of a closed system remains constant, regardless of any interactions happening within the system. The system is 'closed' meaning that no external forces are acting upon it. In this case, the space vehicle and the two smaller pieces it separates into form a closed system. This is consistent with your question's stipulation to ignore external forces, such as gravitational forces.

This can also be understood from the work-energy theorem, which states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. If we consider the vehicle before and after the separation, the kinetic energy of the system remains the same: initially all the energy is concentrated in the moving vehicle, and after the separation, all the kinetic energy is transferred to the moving piece while the at-rest piece has none. Therefore, the work done by the internal forces - which would change the kinetic energy - must be zero.

Learn more about Conservation of momentum here:

brainly.com/question/33316833

#SPJ11