Considering the situation described above, the step required to pass the bill over the President's veto is "approval of the bill by two-thirds of each house of Congress."
This is based on the Constitutional law that established that Congress could override or over veto the President's veto on a bill.
To over veto the bill by Congress, Congress would need to pass the bill with a two-thirds vote from the house, which is the Senate and the House of the Representatives.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "approval of the bill by two-thirds of each house of Congress."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/24988277
The Missouri Compromise declared that an enslaved person gained his or her freedom upon entering a free state is the best states how a section of the Missouri Compromise supported Dred Scott’s argument. Thus, option (a) is correct.
According to the 1850s, the MissouriCompromise and “Bleeding Kansas” were the main goals for the development of slavery into the western territories. The basic goal is to be both free and slave. It denotes slave liberation. Let us resolve the unresolved concerns of slavery.
According to the MissouriCompromise are the based on the provision are:
As a result, the significance of the Missouri Compromise, are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on Missouri Compromise, here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
The Missouri Compromise declared that an enslaved person gained his or her freedom upon entering a free state.
Explanation:
Answer: fair use
Explanation: A P E X
endeavored to secure tranquillity, and to obtain respect for the rights to which we were entitled. As a necessity, not a choice, we have resorted to the (problem, solution, question)
of separation; and henceforth our energies must be directed to the conduct of our own affairs, and the perpetuity of the Confederacy which we have formed.
Answer:
A. Unsuccessfully
B. Solution
Explanation:
They were not able to win the war so they were unsuccessful. They finally had to give in.
Answer: The first one is unseccessfully and the second one is solution.
Answer:
I could be wrong but I am pretty sure the answer is Oil.
Explanation:
After America cut off oil from Japan, due to expansion reasons I believe, Japan got really upset and Pearl Harbor happened if I remember correctly! Hope this helped!! :)
3. What were some of the effects of the Embargo act?
100 PTS PLEASE HELP NOW!!!!
Answer:1 As the Fourth Amendment clearly states, law enforcement can enter a home to search or to arrest an individual if they have a warrant based upon probable cause and signed by a neutral and detached magistrate (which is now called a judge).2 This bill became law on May 1, 1810, and replaced the Non-Intercourse Act. It was an acknowledgment of the failure of economic pressure to coerce the European powers. Trade with both Britain and France was now thrown open, and the United States attempted to bargain with the two belligerents. 3 Image result for What were some of the effects of the Embargo act?3 American president Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-‐Republican party) led Congress to pass the Embargo Act of 1807. Effects on American shipping and markets: Agricultural prices and earnings fell. Shipping-related industries were devastated.
Explanation:
b. He was trying to shift the balance of power defined in the U.S. Constitution.
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation
Critics charged against Rooselvet's attempt to pack the court because he was trying to shift the balance of power defined in the U.S Constitution. Moreover, critics believed that this was a move to neutralize the Supreme Court hostility to his New Deal proposal.
The critics believed Roosevelt’s was trying to shift the balance of power defined in the US Constitution. This implies the correct answer is B
In 1937, the US president Roosevelt communicates his intention to add more judges to the Supreme Court. The bill as proposed by Roosevelt was meant to increase the membership of the Supreme Court to almost 15 judges.
The motive behind the proposed expansion was meant to appoint more judges who will support the new deal legislation. Therefore, the bill was widely criticized and it was never considered by congress.
The critics believed Roosevelt was trying to shift the balance of power as enshrined in the US constitution. They believed the president should not mediate in the affairs of the Supreme Court.
Most of the critics were also of the opinion that the Supreme Court must evaluate laws proposed by the president and congress and can determine which laws are suitable or unsuitable to the constitution of the United States.
President Roosevelt's attempts to increase the justices of the US Supreme court were not successful because he didn’t brief the congressional leaders before the announcement of the bill. As a result, the bill was however not endorsed by the house judiciary committee chairman at the time.
LEARN MORE:
KEYWORDS: