B. "Cf. Hammond [p514] v. South Carolina State College, 272 F.Supp. 947 (D.C.S.C.1967) (orderly protest meeting on state college campus); Dickey v. Alabama State Board of Education, 273 F.Supp. 613 (D.C.M.D. Ala. 967) (expulsion of student editor of college newspaper)."
C. "While the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the Court's statement that the few armband students did not actually "disrupt" the classwork, I think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would."
D. "One does not need to be a prophet or the son of a prophet to know that, after the Court's holding today, some students in Iowa schools — and, indeed, in all schools — will be ready, able, and willing to defy their teachers on practically all orders.
Answer:
A. "In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views. As Judge Gewin, speaking for the Fifth Circuit, said, school officials cannot suppress 'expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend.'"
Explanation:
In this excerpt, the speaker tells us that a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate speech was not found. This shows the importance of precedent. The doctrine of precedent is the idea that judges must inform their decisions by studying past judicial decisions. In this case, the fact that there was no precedent that could justify the regulation of speech means that the judges could not conclude that the regulation of speech had a legitimate constitutional basis.
First of all, you need to know what a trochee is. It is a metrical foot which consists of two syllables - the first one is stressed, and the second one is unstressed. Its 'antonym' would be an iamb which Shakespeare used in his poetry - an iamb also consists of two syllables, however, the first one is unstressed, and the second one is stressed.
An example of a trochee is this line from Poe's 'The Raven:'
AH disTINCTly I reMEMber IT was IN the BLEAK deCEMber.
A. That is why the future of all the American Republics is today in serious danger.
B. That is why every member of the Executive Branch of the Government and every member of the Congress faces great responsibility and great accountability.
C. Just as our national policy in internal affairs has been based upon a decent respect for the rights and the dignity of all our fellow men within our gates
D. so our national policy in foreign affairs has been based on a decent respect for the rights and dignity of all nations, large and small.
E. First, by an impressive expression of the public will and without regard to partisanship, we are committed to all-inclusive national defense.
B. Frequently
C. Honestly
D. Prescient
In the metaphor of language as a layer cake given in your study unit, Prescient could be considered to be a frosting word. Hence, option D is correct.
Metaphors are a type of figurative language, which is used to describe words or statements that have a deeper meaning than they actually do. The literal interpretation of metaphors is frequently quite absurd.
A common metaphor is "Time is money," for instance. The comparison between time and money is figurative; it does not suggest that the quantity of time and the amount of money are equal. Rather, it implies that time is a scarce resource that should be used wisely to generate income.
One participant in our Metaphors for Language Learning session at the recent LinguaMania event at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford gave the analogy that learning a language could be like traversing an ocean.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about metaphor of language, click here
#SPJ5
In the metaphor of language as a layer cake given in your study unit, which of the following words could be considered to be a frosting word? The word that would be considered a frosting word is, D. Prescient
Answer:
Dahmer was careful to kill his victims in a manner that minimized his chances of being caught suggesting that he recognize or appreciated that his behavior was bad/wrong and could control it
Explanation:The American Law Institute model stated that this kind of behaviour called insanity can be referred to as an individual is not accountable or responsible for criminal offence only if at the time the crime/offence was committed as a result of mental disease/defect he lacks considerable/essential capacity to recognize the essence of his crime or restrict his conduct to the rule of law.it is largely known to be one of the slightest victorious and accomplishing defenses of a criminal defense case and it is a very challenging work.
The Brawner rule states that:
"A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law."
Anyone could clearly see that the Milwaukee Monster had the mental capacity to have killed and raped that many people... According to an article published on "The New York Times" , Dahmer "Had taught himself to live behind a mask of normalcy that hid his often contradictory emotions.".
So yes, Dahmer had emotional problems -- but not ones that left him mentally inept. Therefore, he was completely sane when he committed these grisly acts.