The picture above shows 3 sets of balloons, all with a particular charge. Which of the picture(s) is true? Explain. Then explain why the other 2 pictures are incorrect. Make sure to explain all 3 sets.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: Among all of the others Picture 3 is correct.

We know, Like charges repel each other whereas unlike charges attract each other, In picture 3 they are like charges (both are positive) so, we can repulsion hence, picture is correct!

In picture 1, they are unlike charges, & showing repulsion which is wrong, same In picture 2, they are like charges & showing attraction so they are wrong as well

Hope this helps!

Related Questions

As a result of the slow movement of tectonic plates, the ______ Ocean is getting smaller,
What is the function of law
a plane is flying due east in still air at 395 km/h. suddenly, the plane is hit by wind blowing at 55km/h toward the west. what is the resultant velocity of the plane
A material that provides resistance to the flow of electric current is called a(n)
An object that is dropped straight down from a height of 100 m has a vertical change in position that is less than that of an identical object thrown horizontally from the same height. true or false?

Describe the conversions between potential and kinetic energy that occur when you shoot a basketball at a basket

Answers

When you shoot a basketball at a basket, the energy from your hands is transferred into the basketball. When you hold the ball up in preparation to shoot, it has potential energy, meaning that it has stored energy that can turn into kinetic energy. When you shoot it, that potential energy turns into kinetic energy, causing the basketball to move.

Explain at least two differences between justice system laws and scientific laws.

Answers

The adversarial system is rigid – the roles are proscribed – the prosecutor wants to convict, the defendant wants a decision of not guilty. They are not just allowed but expected to bias their presentation, trusting the truth to come out between the adversaries. Science certainly has its sides of partisanship and bias. But these sides are self-imposed and can be abandoned at any time. While a prosecutor should not lie or hide evidence, and should drop a case if they become convinced the defendant is innocent, they wake up in the morning with no choice about which side of the argument they will come down on. In the criminal justice system the advocates are rigidly fixed in their roles and the jurors are rigidly neutral (the process to find a random neutral jury took as long as the trial itself). In science, the advocates are the same people as the jurors. And as a result they have to be willing to be flexible and change their minds. A good scientist shouldn’t have a pre-determined rigid answer to a question.
Lack of investigation – we jurors were told over and over not to investigate the situation ourselves. We were to make our decision only on the basis of the evidence presented to us. I can tell you in the case I was on there were at least two whopping big questions hanging over the case that nearly every juror in the room identified as very important but not addressed by either lawyer. Either one of them (whether the defendant’s schedule allowed time to drink before being stopped in the car, whether a particular medical condition could affect breathalyzer tests) could have changed the outcome. We could have answered one of these with 10 minutes on google and the other with some very simple subpoena of records. But we couldn’t use any of this. Scientists obviously are the opposite – if they need more information, they are expected to go get it before making an opinion.
Reliance on personal testimony – although science and trials share a focus on evidence, trials recognize testimony of individual people under oath as a major form of evidence. They certainly acknowledge the possibility of lying and explicitly instruct jurors to decide what testimony they believe. My case was unusual in that there was so much video footage, but still a majority of the case came down to testimony by the police officers, and most cases even a few years ago would have had only testimony. Science on the other hand, doesn’t accept testimony. Or does it? What else is the methods and results section of a paper? I’m on the fence whether science is so different on this one.

At a objects highest point is the acceleration zero too?

Answers

Answer:

Acceleration from gravity is always constant and downward, but the direction and magnitude of velocity change. At the highest point in its trajectory, the ball has zero velocity, and the magnitude of velocity increases again as the ball falls back toward the earth

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

becuse it's not even outer space there's acceleration there's no such thing as Zero acceleration speed except if you're not in motion.

A 2210 kg 2210 kg space station orbits Earth at an altitude of 5.39 × 10 5 m. 5.39×105 m. Find the magnitude of the force with which the space station attracts Earth. The mass and mean radius of Earth are 5.98 × 10 24 kg 5.98×1024 kg and 6.37 × 10 6 m, 6.37×106 m, respectively.

Answers

Answer:

18466.68 N

Explanation:

mass of satellite, m = 2210 kg

mass of earth, M = 5.98 x 10^24 kg

distance between surface of earth and the satellite, h = 5.39 x 10^5 m

radius of earth, R = 6.37 x 10^6 m

The force between the earth and the satellite is given by

$F = (GMm)/(\left (R+h \right )^(2))$

$F = (6.67* 10^(-11)* 5.98* 10^(24)* 2210)/(\left (6.37+0.539 \right )^(2)* 10^(12))$

F = 18466.68 N

How do you work out the Equivalent Fractiontion to 3/7

Answers

×top and bottom by 2
(you don't have to but it is easier)

6/14=3/7

A focal arrangement that has a thin lens that the light passes through before traveling down the tube to the objective mirror is a _______________.a. Cassegrain focus
b. Newtonian focus
c. Schmidt-Cassegrain focus
d. Schmidt focus

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Schmidt-Cassegrain focus." A focal arrangement that has a thin lens that the light passes through before traveling down the tube to the objective mirror is a Schmidt-Cassegrain focus.
Here are the following choices:
a. Cassegrain focus
b. Newtonian focus
c. Schmidt-Cassegrain focus
d. Schmidt focus

Other Questions

fastest humans can reach speeds of about 11 m/s. part a in order to increase his gravitational potential energy by an amount equal to his kinetic energy at full speed, how high would such a sprinter need to climb? express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.

A marble statue has a mass of 6,200 grams and a volume of 2,296 cm3. What is the density of marble?

Which one of the following types of electromagnetic radiation causes certain substances to fluoresce? A. Cosmic raysB. Ultraviolet rays(C. X rays)D. Infrared wavesA virtual image produced by a lens is always A. located in front of the lens.(B. located in the back of the lens.)C. smaller than the object.D. larger than the object.Reflecting telescopes are popular because they're A. more durable than a refracting telescope.B. more powerful than a refracting telescope.C. easier to build than a refracting telescope.(D. smaller than a refracting telescope.)The unit for measuring the rate at which light energy is radiated from a source is the A. lux.B. lumen.(C. candela.)D. AngstromA magnifying glass is an example of a _______ lens. A. plano-concave(B. plano-convex)C. double-concaveD. convergingmy answer is in ( ) and the answers are wrong please tell me the correct answer because i dont have a clue

A very small 100-g object is attached to one end of a massless 10-cm rod that is pivoted without friction about the opposite end. The rod is held vertical, with the object at the top, and released, allowing the rod to swing. What is the speed of the object at the instant that the rod is horizontal?