Which was an argument used by supporters of the U.S. Constitution in favor of its ratification.?A.
A woman's right to vote will be protected by the highest law of the land.

B.
A federal government with two separate branches makes the most sense.

C.
There is a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.

D.
Appointing a president-for-life will make the United States stronger.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

C. There is a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.

Explanation:

During the debates to ratify the U.S. Constitution as we know it today, two main groups emerged: those who supported it alleging that it was necessary to establish a strong central government with enough enforce powers to properly lead the nation (the Federalists), and those who opposed its ratification believing that it gave too much power to the government and did not specify people's rights, which would inevitably lead the government to abuse its powers (the Anti-federalists).

However, to this objection, the Federalists argued that under the newly proposed constitution the government was divided into three branches who would rule under the system of checks and balances, which it's a system whereby each branch of the government can oversee, limit and check the actions of the other, and this way, the system could prevent abuse of power.

Answer 2
Answer: A strong argument used to support the ratification of the U.S. Constitution was that C) there was a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. This was a major fear of the early Americans especially those that strongly supported states' rights. 

Related Questions

What advice did Paul Bunyan's mother give him?
What led to the Truman doctrine and containment? What pattern of foreign policy did the doctrine establish?
Us political issue that occurred in the late 19th century after large silver reserves
List some reasons that nations join together what common issues do they share?​
What were Andrew Jackson's accomplishments as president?

Why did the Roman Empire last longer in the east ​

Answers

the Roman's split the empire in two the East And West since the country was to big to rule by few people the west had the capital of rome while the east had the captial of Istanbul. in the West we will call them Roman's while in the east we will call them Byzantines. in the west the Roman's had more significant problems such as revolts and invasions from the Germanic Tribes which eventually overwhelmed the Roman's which caused them to fall a other major cause is economic downfall as the romans were fighting in so many wars at that time they couldn't even pay thier soldiers properly. in the east the byzantines were fighting a war with the persians and keep in mind they were still part of the Roman empire just split up until rome fell then they became the byzantium empire. anyways in the east they had rebellions but not major ones and they also had other Nations around them but most of them never posted a threat except for Persia a other significant cause is that byzantine was mostly never under threat and were basicly in only one war against Persia unlike rome which were against multiple after rome fell byzantium empire was born they took back rome for a while then lost it and kept losing land to revolts and tribes around the middle east then the ottomans came and killed em basicly in the 1400's

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

Answers

The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that

Answer:  The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.

Explanation:  In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.

Who is the Greek god that stole food from the other gods

Answers

the answer is the greek god Tantalus

Answer:

Tantalus

Explanation:

Why did Japan's attack on the Chinese city of Nanjing receive significant attention from the rest of the world? A. A large number of Americans staying in Nanjing were taken prisoner. B. Nanjing had been considered too well-defended to be attacked. C. China had been an ally of Japan before the attack took place. D. Japanese soldiers massacred citizens of Nanjing during the attack.

Answers

The fourth alternative is correct (D).

The Japanese invasion of Nanjing during World War II was marked by the violence of the Japanese soldiers against the civilian population of the city.

This episode became known as the Nanjing massacre. Japanese soldiers have committed various war crimes like  rapers, murder, robbery, arson and torture.



Answer:

d

Explanation:

6.___He journeyed to the court of the great Kublai Khan, returning to Europe after seventeen years.

Answers

Marco Polo traveled to China in the 13th century, and saw several new things there.

A result of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor was

Answers

Answer:

C  ''thousands of Americans died, and the US declared war''

The us declared war on Japan after the bombing of Pearl Harbor