If the Congress outlawed slavery for the whole nation, there would be an economic disaster and the whites would not be able to keep blacks as slaves.
In the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson called the African slave trade an “execrable commerce” and an affront “against human nature itself.” Because of a concession to slave-holding interests, the Constitution stipulates that it may not be abolished
If Congress outlawed slavery for the whole nation there would be barely any cotton, since slaves were the main reason why there was cotton because they used to work in the cotton plantations. So the South would probably be broken since, as there would be no cash crop.
Therefore, would be many negative consequences if Congress outlawed slavery for the whole nation.
To learn more about slavery, click here:
#SPJ2
contextualizing and questioning
Answer:
Henry Vll was the king of England and lord of Ireland from his seizure of the crown on 22 August 1485 to his death he was first monarch of the house of tudor.
Please answer using pages 166-169. If you want to be REALLY helpful, then if you could do problems 1-4, that would be really kind of you. ;-)
Many abolitionists spoke out against slavery citing its cruelty and its effects on society. Many former slaves like Frederick Douglas spoke of his experience as a slave and his eloquent speeches made people realize that Blacks had the potential to do great things. They also distributed pamphlets and reading materials on the evils of slavery. The most successful propaganda that they made was the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin where it opened the eyes of the public about the cruelties of slavery.
Before the French Revolution, French society was structured in three estates: the clergy, the nobility and the third estate, which was composed by the commoners, peasants, and merchants. A member of the bourgeoisie during this time, in the 18th century, was a rich person from the third estate, often merchants and artisans. Normally, in spite of their wealth, they were excluded from the political decisions and had no privileges, since the power was in the hands of the nobility. Thus, the bourgeoisie was the social progressive class that supported a constitutional government and natural right, as opposed to the Law of Privilege and rule by divine right claimed by the nobles and clergy.
Nobles, on the other hand, formed the second estate according to a feudal social stratification. They were benefited by this social configuration based on, what they believed was, a divine right to rule. Therefore, a noble at this period was an aristocrat related to the royalty and the Church and had the highest status in the French and European society. They normally owned large extensions of land and had many peasants at their service, they were the only ones to have the privilege of hunting and were exempt of paying direct land taxes that commoners landowners were obliged to pay.
The social order of pre-Revolutionary France was composed of three states: the 1st state was made up of clergymen, the 2nd state included all the nobility, and the 3rd state was formed by the rest of the population of France, including the peasantry, the bourgeoisie, and the city workers.
The experiences of the nobility and the bourgeoisie were very different during this period. The nobiity included around 1-2% of the population of the country. They were mostly exempt from taxes and for the most part, did not have a job. On the other hand, the bourgeoisie was a large percentage of the population, and carried a significant tax burden. This class was the most educated and wealthiest part of the 3rd State, and they resented the privileges of the nobles, in particular the tax exemptions. The conflict between these classes was a reason for the French Revolution.