The correct option is C. SER jeans maker is designing a new line of jeans. These jeans will sell for $410 per unit and cost $328 per unit in variable costs to make Fixed out 120.000. If 5,000 units are produced and sold, income equals $290,000.
Sales (5,000×$410) = $2,050,000
Less: Variable costs (5,000×$328) = 1,640,000
Contribution margin = 410,000
Less: Fixed costs = 120,000
Net income (loss)
Variable charges are fees that alternate as the amount of the coolest or service that an enterprise produces adjustments. Variable costs are the sum of marginal expenses over all devices produced. They also can be taken into consideration regular fees. constant charges and variable charges make up the two additives of the total price. Direct costs are costs that could without problems be related to a particular value object.
But, no longer all variable fees are direct charges. for instance, variable production overhead fees are variable fees that might be indirect prices, not direct costs. Variable prices are once in a while known as unit-stage costs as they range with the range of devices produced. Direct hard work and overhead are regularly known as conversion fees, whilst direct cloth and direct labor are frequently known as top prices.
To learn more about Variable costs visit here:
#SPJ4
Answer:
The cash payments for September are $646000
Explanation:
The cash payments for merchandise are divided into to parts. The previous month's 70% payments and this month's 30% payments. Thus, the cash payments for the month of september will be 70% for AAugust purchases and 30% for september's purchases.
Thus the cash payments for merchandise will be,
Cash Payments = 0.7 * 610000 + 0.3 * 730000 = $646000
Answer:
=646000
Explanation:
30% pay in the month of purchase .
Note that th purchase made in September is $730,000 and 30% is due that month.
= 30% × 730,000
= 219,000
70% in the following month
For his category, payment be made in September should relate to purchases made in August, and $610,000 was purchased in August
=70%× $610,000
=427,000
Cash payment f r te September
= 219,000 + 427,000
=$646,000
Purchases (gross) 697,000
Freight-in 31,400
Sales revenue 924,000
Sales returns 73,200
Purchase discounts 12,100
Compute the estimated inventory at May 31, assuming that the gross profit is 40% of net sales
Answer:
The estimated inventory at May 31 is $240,100
Explanation:
The gross profit is the difference between the sales revenue and the cost of good sold.
The gross profit percentage is the ratio of gross profit to net sales expressed as a percentage.
Net sales is the sales less returns and allowances. Similar to net sales is net purchases which is the gross purchase net the allowances and returns.
Net purchases = $697,000 - $12,100
= $684,900
Net sales = $924,000 - $73,200
= $850,800
Gross profit margin percent = gross profit/net sales
gross profit = 0.4 * $850,800
= $212,700
cost of goods sold = $850,800 - $212,700
= $638,100
The movement in the balance of inventory at the start and end of a period is as a result of sales and purchases. While sales reduces the balance in inventory, purchases increases the balance. This may be expressed mathematically as
Opening balance + purchases + freight inward - cost of goods sold = closing balance
$161,900 + $684,900 + $31,400 - $638,100 = Estimated ending inventory
Estimated ending inventory = $240,100
Answer: George's initial price markup over marginal cost was approximately 41.2% George's desired markup is 45% Since George's initial markup, or actual margin, was Less than his desired margin, raising the price was profitable
Explanation:
a) Price Elasticity of Demand = [(Q1-Q2)/(Q1+Q2)] / [(P1-P2)/(P1+P2)]
= 5000- 4000/4000+ 5000) / 8.50- 9.50 /8.50 ₊9.50 =
1000/8000 / -1/ 18 = 0.125/-0.055 = -2.2
George's initial price markup over marginal cost was approximately
when Marginal cost = $5
b)initial price markup = Price - marginal cost / price = 8.50 - 5.00/ 8.50 = 0.412= 41.2%
C) George's desired margin = 1/absolute value of price elasticity = 1/ 2.2= 0.45= 45%
.
D)Since George's initial markup or actual margin was less than his desired margin, raising the price is profitable.
This is because When the markup is lower than the margin, business is running on a loss, so it is nessesary to increase price.
The price elasticity of demand for George's T-shirts is approximately -1.7, indicating that demand is elastic. The initial markup over the cost price was 70%, but the question doesn't specify the desired markup or if raising the price satisfied that margin.
The price elasticity of demand measures how sensitive the quantity demanded is to a price change. It's calculated as the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by the percentage change in price. In George's case:
So, the percentage change in quantity = (4000-5000)/5000 = -20% and percentage change in price = ($9.50-$8.50)/$8.50 = 11.76%. Therefore, price elasticity of demand = -20%/11.76% = -1.7 (approx.). This indicates that the demand is elastic, meaning quantity demanded is sensitive to price changes.
Regarding the price markup, this is the percentage increase over the cost price. The initial markup = ($8.50-$5)/$5 = 70%. The question didn't specify the desired markup, or if raising the price satisfied the desired margin.
#SPJ3
Answer:
This agent is probably guilty of
Blockbusting
Explanation:
Blockbusting is an illegal act. It is a manipulative method used by real estate agents to get homeowners to sell or rent their property at a cheaper rate by lying to them that the socioeconomic demography of the neighborhood is changing, so they have to sell before it is too late. This can be seen in how the agent informs the owners that their property experienced a decline in the past 5 years because of the minorities who moved in. The Fair Housing Act of 1968 makes blockbusting illegal.
Year 2 Year 3
Amounts billed to customers for services rendered $ 320,000 $ 420,000
Cash collected from credit customers 230,000 370,000
Cash disbursements:
Payment of rent 77,000 0
Salaries paid to employees for services rendered during the year 137,000 157,000
Travel and entertainment 27,000 37,000
Advertising 13,500 32,000
In addition, you learn that the company incurred advertising costs of $24,000 in year 2, owed the advertising agency $4,900 at the end of year 1, and there were no liabilities at the end of year 3. Also, there were no anticipated bad debts on receivables, and the rent payment was for a two-year period, year 2 and year 3.
Required:
1. Calculate accrual net income for both years.
2. Determine the amount due the advertising agency that would be shown as a liability on RPG’s balance sheet at the end of year 2.
Answer:
RPG Company
1. Accrual Net Income for Year 2 and Year 3:
Year 2 Year 3
Amounts billed to customers for services $ 320,000 $ 420,000
Expenses:
Rent 38,500 0
Salaries paid to employees for services 137,000 157,000
Travel and entertainment 27,000 37,000
Advertising 24,000 16,600
Net Income $93,500 $170,900
2. Determination of the liability for Advertising:
Advertising Expense:
Year 1 balance = $4,900
Year 2 = $24,000
Cash paid (13,500)
Balance $15,400
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
RPG Company.
Year 2 Year 3
Amounts billed to customers for services $ 320,000 $ 420,000
Cash collected from credit customers 230,000 370,000
Cash disbursements:
Payment of rent 77,000 0
Salaries paid to employees for services 137,000 157,000
Travel and entertainment 27,000 37,000
Advertising 13,500 32,000
Year 2 Year 3
Service Revenue: $ 320,000 $ 420,000
Accounts Receivable
Service revenue $320,000
Cash collected 230,000
Balance Year 2 $90,000
Service revenue 420,000
Cash collected 370,000
Balance Year 3 $50,000
Advertising Expense:
Year 1 balance = $4,900
Year 2 = $24,000
Cash paid (13,500)
Balance $15,400
Year 3 = 16,600
Cash paid 32,000
Balance 0
The accrual net income for RPG Company in Year 2 is $55,000, and in Year 3 is $194,000. The amount due to the advertising agency shown as a liability on RPG's balance sheet at the end of Year 2 is $0, as it was completely paid off in that year.
In order to calculate the accrual net income and determine the liability of the advertising agency, we first need to correctly account for all the incomes and expenses. Here's how it works:
Accrual net income is calculated as revenues (Amounts billed to customers) minus expenses. For year 2, the expenses include Payments of rent, Salaries paid, Travel and entertainment, and Advertising costs. For year 3, as there was no rent payment and no liabilities at the end of the year, we deduct only the Salaries paid, Travel and entertainment, and Advertising costs from the revenues.
Revenues
Year 2: $320,000
Year 3: $420,000
Expenses
Year 2: Rent($77,000) + Salary($137,000) + Travel & Entertainment($27,000) + Advertising($24,000) = $265,000
Year 3: Salary($157,000) + Travel & Entertainment($37,000) + Advertising($32,000) = $226,000
Accrual Net Income
Year 2: $320,000 - $265,000 = $55,000
Year 3: $420,000 - $226,000 = $194,000
The amount owed to the advertising agency that should be considered as a liability at the end of year 2 can be figured out by taking into account the advertising expenses incurred in year 2 and the previous year's outstanding. But since we learn that there were no liabilities at the end of year 3, the outstanding $4,900 at the end of year 1 must be paid in year 2 along with the incurred cost of $24,000. Therefore, the liability at the end of year 2 would be $0.
#SPJ3
Answer:
5.56%
Explanation:
Computation for holding-period return
Using this formula
Holding-period return =(Stock sales- Purchased Share + Dividend)/Purchased share
Let plug in the formula
Where,
Stock sales=92
Purchased Share=90
Dividend=3
Holding-period return=(92 - 90 + 3) / 90
Holding-period return=5/90
Holding-period return=0.0556×100
Holding-period return= 5.56%
Therefore the Holding-period return will be 5.56%