Imagine you wanted to convince an uninformed person to take a political position that is the same as yours. What issue would you try to talk about? How would you include ethos, pathos, and logos in your persuasion?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: I say talk about economic policy. Argue for a position you believe in (be it Socialism, Laissez-Faire Capitalism, or whatever). I would start by using a anecdote that described the issue using the negative consequences of embracing the other perspective, immediately tarnishing the person's first impression of the opposite ideology. Then, I would involve logos by saying things like "just think about it, and you'll realize it makes perfect sense" and explaining my position as though it were a formula. Ethos would come into the picture when I mention the opinions of professionals and scholars who I've hand=picked to agree with me on the topic. Pathos has already been used in the form of the beginning anecdote, a "sob story" so to speak.
Hope that I helped!
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

To convince an uninformed person to take a political position, I would focus on climate change and use ethos, pathos, and logos to support my persuasion.

Explanation:

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in Persuasion

If I were trying to convince an uninformed person to take a political position that is the same as mine, I would focus on the issue of climate change. To include ethos, I would establish my credibility by providing facts and statistics from reputable sources like scientific research institutes or government reports. For pathos, I would appeal to emotions by discussing the potential consequences of climate change, such as extreme weather events or the loss of natural habitats. Lastly, for logos, I would use logical reasoning to explain the cause-and-effect relationships between human activities and climate change, as well as the effectiveness of certain policies or actions in mitigating it.

Learn more about Persuasion in politics here:

brainly.com/question/1474839

#SPJ11


Related Questions

What two true things come to Brian's mind after not being rescued by the plane
Stuttering affects more males than females. People overcome stuttering typically by the ageof 16 years, but not all people overcome stuttering. Although the actual causes of stutteringare still unresolved; it is believed that stuttering may be caused by one or more of thefollowing:O EmotionalO GeneticsO EnvironmentalO All of the abovePlease answer asap
Identify the correct sentenceI bought a​ beautiful, pitcher, and eight glasses.B.I bought a beautiful​ pitcher, and eight glasses.C.I bought a beautiful pitcher and eight glasses.D.I bought​ a, beautiful​ pitcher, and eight glasses.
In To Kill A Mockingbird, why does Atticus think that Southern juries convict innocent men?
Which excerpt highlights the theme of the fleeting nature of life? But at my back I always hearTime's winged chariot hurrying near;And yonder all before us lie Deserts of vast eternity. (Andrew marvell, " to his coy mistress)And poppy or charms can make us sleep as well And better than thy stroke; why swell'st thou then?One short sleep past, we wake eternally And death shall be no more; death, thou shalt die. (John Donne, sonnet 10)Of what is fit and not. Forsake thy cage, Thy rope of sands,Which petty thoughts have made, and made to thee (George herbert, "the collar")Thy beams, so reverend and strong Why shouldst thou think?I could eclipse and cloud them with a wink, But that I would not lose her sight so long;(John Donne, "the sun rising ")

Rewrite each sentence below using a metaphor : 1. Wasting time is bad
2. The accident taught me to be more careful when I cross the street.


If you know even one out of two it's ok, say it

Answers

Answer and explanation:

A metaphor is a figure of speech that makes a comparison between two different things without using supporting words - "like" or "as". The intention is to attribute a quality belonging to one of those things to the other. When using this figure of speech, the speaker states that "thing A is thing B". The literal meaning would be strange, making no sense. But, when we think of it figuratively, we can see the speaker is merely comparing the two things mentioned to state a quality or characteristic.

So, if we wish to say that wasting time is bad, we can compare the action of wasting time to something that everyone would see as bad, such as a demon. The metaphor would be:

- Wasting time is a demon.

Also, if we aim to claim that the accident taught us to be more careful when we cross the street, we can compare the accident to someone who clearly teaches something. Thus:

- The accident was my teacher.

1. dont put off what you could do today for tomorow

Put these in order from least to greatest 6.4 kg 640 g 600,000 mg

Answers

6.4 kg= 6400 g
600000 mg = 600 g

600000mg< 640g< 6.4 kg

Hello i need help with some questions please help asap i will put below

Answers

the passage is written in the first person point of view, because it is spoken by one who is referred to as "I"
third person because it is someone else saying it

Please help me with this

Answers

What the excerpt is trying to convey is that, with the current generation we are so preoccupied with own self-interests. We value vanity, self and glory without considering the individuals we face as we walk, as we talk and as we engage. The passage reinstates that individuals have to get back and introspect about not their own gratifications and egotistical desires but the welfare with others, even though it is innate and inevitable that we always point to the ego.

Which of the following articles would most benefit from a problem and solution organization pattern?An article explaining your ideas on how to best rescue endangered loggerhead turtle eggs

An article comparing the loggerhead turtle rescue efforts on different beaches

An article discussing the life span of the loggerhead turtle

An article explaining why the loggerhead turtle is an endangered species

Answers

I think the answer is:
An article explaining your ideas on how to best rescue endangered loggerhead turtle eggs

I believe it is A, the problem and solution organization pattern consists of two parts.

Where it explains what the problem and topic is, and the second part is how to find the solution and exploit it.

What is the authors purpose in both patrick henry's speech and thomas paine's common sense?

Answers

The correct option is this: TO CONVINCE THE COLONISTS TO BREAK AWAY FROM THE BRITISH RULE.
These two authors presented their works during the time that the colonist were under the rule of the British. The principal purpose of the works of these two author is to make the colonists to see that there is no benefit in keeping quiet under the harsh rule of the British, that a break away is needed in order for the colonists to gain their freedom.

Answer:

TO CONVINCE THE COLONISTS TO BREAK AWAY FROM THE BRITISH RULE.

Explanation:

fact