The answers are A and C
Hamilton’s economic system can be good in terms of economy. It will create a stronger country at the however, it will also create a disparity between the wealthy and the poor. The wealthy will become wealthier by lending their money to the poor while the poor will be poorer because they will be full of debts
Answer:
The two compromises established a delicate balance between the North and the South.
Explanation:
The Great Compromise of 1787, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a political agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that defined the structure of the legislature of the United States. Under the Compromise, the legislature would be divided in two chambers: the Senate, as the upper house, where every state would have equal representation, and the Congress, the lower house, where seats would be allocated to states proportionally, according to their population. The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, was the other great compromise agreed during the Constitutional Convention. According to this compromise, three out of every five slaves would be counted as part of the population of each slave state when allocating seats for the Congress.
The political significance of these two compromises was that they established a delicate balance between the North and the South. For the northern states, which were generally smaller than the southern ones, the Great Compromise meant that they would be considered as equals. For the southern states, the Three-Fifths Compromise meant that they were overrepresented. If slaves had not been counted, they'd have been a minority in Congress. However, this balance was very fragile, and the disagreements between the North and South erupted into the Civil War of 1861-65,
The Great Compromise proposed a bicameral congress to achieve political balance between small and large states, and the Three-Fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of enslaved persons for federal representation and taxation, giving extra political power to slave states. Both compromises significantly shaped the U.S. political landscape.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise had significant political implications for the formation and structure of the United States government. The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, proposed a bicameral congress. It assuaged the fears of both small and large states by allowing for variable representation: equal representation for each state in the Senate and proportional representation in the House of Representatives, based on state population.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, on the other hand, pertained to the issue of slavery and representation. Under this compromise, three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's representation in the House of Representatives and its federal tax bill. This compromise effectively gave extra political power to slave states and had a profound impact on the political balance between the North and South. However, it also entrenched racial prejudice in the Constitution by implying that enslaved people were less than fully human.
Both compromises played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. political landscape. They determined how states were represented in the federal government and managed contentious issues like slavery, ensuring the preservation of the Union.
#SPJ3
to learn more about nursing
a. Television encouraged people to become more diverse
b. Television heightened interest in books and newspapers.
c. Television encouraged people to help others
d. Television promoted a common culture
2. How did the civil rights movement begin to change in the mid 1960s?
a. As more laws were passed, their provisions were more easily implemented
b. Many black leaders began to take a more militant approach to civil rights
c. Congress passed additional laws to remove loopholes
d. White leaders joined black leaders in persuading whites to join the movement
B) The U.S Treasury might refuse to sell securities to Pedro because it does not have any bonds to sell.
C) The Federal Reverse could raise the price of securities, to encourage Pedro to buy other things instead.
D) Banks might raise their interest rates, encouraging Pedro to deposit his money there instead of buying securities.
Answer:
sir teh answer will be A because it the most reasonable answer.
i took the test and i got it right
Explanation: