to provide information about the inner thoughts and feelings of a character
to set the mood and tone of the play and provide background information
to provide information about how the stage should be set and what props are needed
to give some insight into the relationships among different characters
to provide a hint to the audience about what will happen later in the play
Answer:
B.
It comments on the action and provides background information.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Death Penalty should not be abolished. The death penalty has been successful for thousands of years. It is effective because it deters criminals from committing serious crimes, it is quick, painless and cost effective, it also appeases the victims’ families.
A jail term will not be a deterrent for those who have committed serious crimes. Mu*derers, kidn*ppers, ra*ists, or dr*g lords should know that if found guilty, they would be given the death penalty. This should make them think twice before committing brutal acts of crime. Some countries and states that have abolished the death penalty were forced to revert back to the lethal punishment when they couldn’t keep the rising crime rates under control. States like Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Arizona, California, Utah and Washington still send hardcore criminals to die, by gas inhalation, lethal injection or hanging. Criminals know that committing serious crimes can lead to the death penalty. If they still dare commit such crimes, then they should be held responsible and made to face the law. When the innocent become victims of horrendous crimes, it’s only fair that the criminals are not let off the hook.
Furthermore, It is true that even with the threat of the death penalty, violent crimes are committed with exemption. Dr*g traffickers and pushers operate freely; and the threat of gang fights, r*pe, m*rder, armed robbery and kidn*pping under the influence of drugs as well as dr*g-related disputes are ever present. But what more of the country abolishes the death penalty?
H*ll will break loose, and more criminals will dare to commit serious crimes. There will also be a free flow of dr*gs that will destroy social order. The opinion that even the death penalty has not deterred criminals from committing serious crimes cannot be an excuse to get rid of said law.
Next, the thought to abolish the death penalty has to be carefully studied. The death penalty is still needed when a country is littered with crimes that can create fear in criminals, as well as hope in citizens. Humanitarians, practicing lawyers, and others who push for abolishing capital punishment should not be so concerned about about the lives of m*rderers, r*pists, kiddn*ppers, and dr*g traffickers, and ignore the countless numbers of violent deaths of victims who were innocent caused by these criminals. Without the death penalty it could give criminals the wrong idea, such as disgusting and disturbing crimes not being taken seriously with punishment. The repeal of the death penalty treats all murders as the same. Once a person commits a single act of murder, each additional murder is a freebie.
On the other hand, some would say the death penalty is r*cist, inhumane, and outright wrong. But, crime has nothing to do with race, gender, sexulaity, etc. If you’re a bad person commiting crimes, that's just who they are. The death Penalty stops criminals from committing serious crimes. In no way should a person take or torture an innocent life, and not have any repercussion for what they did.
In conclusion, abolishing the death penalty will only send the wrong signal to those who have the tendency to commit horrible crimes. Sparing the lives of hardcore criminals for humanitarian reasons will only cause more misery for others. It will see a rise of serious crimes in our society, further impairing the nation.
Explanation:
you will have to go thru and get rid of the *, it wouldnt let me publish without the words blocked
Answer:
Formal prose must be carefully organized because it must be logical and professional. The more organized you are, the better your communication will be
2) Do phrase structure rules represent deep structure or surface structure?
3) Which of the following expressions are structurally ambiguous and in what way?
a) These are designed for small boys and girls.
b) The parents of the bride and groom were waiting outside.
c) How come a bed has four legs, but only one foot?
d) We met an English history teacher.
e) Flying planes can be dangerous.
f) The students complained to everyone that they couldn't understand.
1) What is wrong with the following rule of English syntactic structure?
Answer: The correct version of this rule is: "A prepositional phrase is formed with a preposition followed by a noun/noun phrase/pronoun."
Explanation:
Prepositional phrase normally consists of a preposition which is followed either by a noun, pronoun or a noun phrase. If we state in the definition that a preposition is followed by a noun only, it will not encompass all of the cases and will lead to certain ungrammatical structures, such as "with girl". In this particular case, we need to add an article before the noun, and thus create a noun phrase "a girl."
2) Do phrase structure rules represent deep structure or surface structure?
Answer: Deep structure.
Explanation:
The two terms, deep structure and surface structure, were proposed by Noam Chomsky, a linguist and a cognitive scientist. Chomsky argued that deep structures are generated by phrase-structure rules, while surface structures are constructed from deep structures when they undergo certain transformations. As he defined it, deep structure represents concepts, thoughts and ideas, while the language that we use to describe the deep structure is called surface structure. Deep structure is a necessary condition for the application of transformation rules.
3) Which of the following expressions are structurally ambiguous and in what way?
Answer:
(a) The meaning of this sentence can be interpreted as "for small boys and (all) girls" or "for small boys and (small) girls."
b) "The parents of the bride and (the) groom" - as if only the bride's parents were present
"The parents of the bride and (the parents of the) groom"
d) The history teacher could be from England, or the teacher could teach English history
e) "Flying planes" can be interpreted as planes that are flying, or one's occupation
f) The students either complained to everyone whom they could not understand, or they told everyone about their problem that they could not understand.
Explanation:
Let us first define what structural ambiguity is. Structural (also known as syntactic) ambiguity is a situation in which there are multiple possible interpretations of a single piece of language (it can be a phrase, sentence, clause, etc.). The ambiguity occurs due to the way in which words and phrases are organized. In this case, all sentences except sentence c) are structurally ambiguous.
Lexical ambiguity, on the other hand, is when a single word can be interpreted in different ways. This is seen in sentence c), where we have different meanings for "legs" and "foot."
Answer:
above is right give climentine brainlest
Explanation:
A. fear
B. mourning
C. emotion
D. sadness
grief: (B) mourning
In a celebration, everyone is merry where as in mourning, people are struck by grief.