What is the difference between sarcasm and irony?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Basically, sarcasm and irony are the same thing. They both mean the exact opposite of what they REALLY are saying. So what is the difference?
Irony can naturally occur in both language and circumstance; one experiences irony when something the exact opposite of what was was expected happens.
Sarcasm can make use of irony to make an observation or remark about an idea, person or situation. Sarcasm is generally used to express riducle or reservation of an expression or idea.
Hope this helps! (:
Answer 2
Answer: Sarcasm and irony are slightly different.
Sarcasm is a type of humor that is meant to be a witty remark or retort. Sarcasm is the use of irony to mock a concept or convey contempt.
Irony is a type of humor that uses the unexpected and unlikely to form a joke.

Related Questions

No one types as fast as (she, her) on a word processor. (1 point) she her
Which sentence uses correct punctuation? My mother always told me that, "slow and steady wins the race." My mother always told me that, "Slow and steady wins the race." My mother always told me that "Slow and steady wins the race." My mother always told me that "slow and steady wins the race."
Resistant and yielding ?
What's 2+2? This is really hard and I need help I cried for one hour PLS HALP.
Which term describes the division between communist and noncommunist Europe?a. the policy of containment b. the Iron Curtain c. the National Guard d. the Cold War

Why is Scout an effective narrator? A. Scout tells the story of her childhood with childlike innocence.

B. Scout tells about her childhood from an adult perspective.


C. Scout is able to relate what happens to Jem from personal experience.


D. Scout gives insight into adult issues from a child's perspective.

Answers

Good Morning


Answer B

Scout tells about her childhood from an adult perspective


I hope that's help ↑↑↑

↓↓↓↓↓↓

Happy Sunday :)

What is one effect of repeating Ráma's name numerous times in The Rámáyan of Válmíki?It creates a rhythmic pattern.
It emphasizes Ráma's importance.
It identifies Ráma as supernatural.
It shows that Ráma is the main villain.

Answers

It identifies Rama as supernatural. The actual thing is that Valmiki was a dacoit. Lord Shani came to change him.He created such situation which made him realize that he was doing wrong. He told Valmiki to repeat 'Mara' numerous times which means'dead' and ultimately he began to say 'Rama' unknowingly.He transformed and became a saint.

The one effect of repeating Rama's name numerous times in the Ramayana of Valmiki identifies Rama as supernatural, hence option C is correct.

What is the Ramayana?

The ancient Sanskrit epic the Ramayana tells the story of Prince Rama's struggle to rescue his loving wife Sita from Ravana. It is usually attributed to the sage Valmiki as its originator and dates to about 500 and 100 BCE.

It reveals Rama to be supernatural. What actually happened was that Valmiki was a con man. To transform him, lord Shani arrived. He intentionally put himself in a position where he realized what he was doing was wrong.

He repeatedly instructed Valmiki to speak the word "Mara," which means "dead," until eventually, unintentionally, he started to say "Rama." He changed and attained sainthood.

Therefore, it identifies Rama as supernatural, hence option C is correct.

Learn more about Ramayana, here:

brainly.com/question/18025051

#SPJ5

The Argument that we should not use people merely as a means (from section 1.2 of Rachels book) is an attempt to show that a) we ought to transplant baby Theresa's organs because it has overall good consequences (it benefits someone without harming anyone). b) we ought not to transplant baby Theresa's organs because it would involve using her merely as a means. c) we ought not to transplant baby Theresa's organs because it would kill her. d) none of the above.

Answers

Answer:

b) we ought not to transplant baby Theresa's organs because it would involve using her merely as a means.

Explanation:

From section 1.2 of Rachels book which is an attempt to show that the argument we should not use people merely as a means holds true.

Certainly, we ought not to transplant baby Theresa's organs because it would involve using her merely as a means.

The above statement implies, it involves violating baby Theresa's autonomy through manipulation, trickery, deceit, or coercion and when we cannot violate her autonomy in such a way (because she has no autonomy), it may involve violating her interests or preferences.

Answer:

A) we ought to transplant baby Theresa's organs because it has overall good consequences (it benefits someone without harming anyone).

Explanation:

Which line from "She Walks in Beauty" describes the woman in an unusual way?

Answers

The 1st stanza "she walks in beauty like the night", is quite an unusual way of describing the beauty of this woman because night has a negative portrayal of emotion while beauty is always referenced to light or jovial emotions. 

Which emotion describes Gulliver's initial reaction to hearing about the struldbrugs best?

Answers

That emotions is : Excitement

Since according to the information that he heard, Struldbrugs are immortal. This make Gulliver really excited and want to investigate the immortality

Why are classical allegories not regarded as realistic fiction?

Answers

The correct answer is:

Their characters are generally flat and merely function as symbols for particular concepts.

Explanation:

Writers or speakers typically use allegories as discovered devices or as rhetorical devices that convey (semi-)hidden instead complicated applications by symbolic figures, actions, metaphors, or events, which collectively create the moral, spiritual, or political interest the author wishes to write Classical allegories are metaphorical in nature. This means that they include metaphors, imagery, and symbolical messages all eventually the story. Stories are often philosophical and political in nature that could impose morals or education. Allegories are involved in nature and are often thought-provoking and can be defined uniquely by each of its readers, spectators or listeners. On the other hand, genuine fiction is a type of fiction in which the story has elements that can be seen by the audience as something that is currently subsisting and convincing to them.

Classical allegories are metaphorical in nature. This means that they contain metaphors, imagery and symbolical messages all throughout the story. Stories are often philosophical and political in nature that could impose morals or enlightenment. Allegories are complex in nature and are often thought-provoking and can be interpreted uniquely by each of its readers, viewers or listeners. On the other hand, realistic fiction is a type of fiction in which the story has elements that can be seen by the audience as something that is currently existing and believable to them. A person, place or animal is known to the audience and the author; and these elements are only used to create a different story that is fictional with a realistic setting.