The freedom petitions presented by slaves in New England sought legal recognition of their right to freedom.
The freedom petitions presented by slaves to New England courts and legislatures aimed at Option 3: gaining legal recognition of their right to freedom. These petitions were a significant part of the abolitionist movement and were filed by enslaved individuals who sought to be freed from bondage. Through these petitions, slaves asserted their desire for freedom and challenged the legality of slavery itself.
#SPJ11
Freedom petitions presented by slaves to New England courts and legislatures were primarily aimed To gain legal recognition of their right to freedom. Thus the correct option is Option (3).
The primary goal of freedom petitions presented by enslaved individuals to New England courts and legislatures was to secure legal recognition of their right to freedom, as indicated in Option 3. These petitions served as a formal legal avenue through which enslaved people sought emancipation. In many cases, they based their claims on the principles of liberty and equality enshrined in the newly formed United States. By submitting these petitions, slaves aimed to challenge the institution of slavery and gain their rightful freedom through legal means. Thus the correct option is Option (3).
These petitions were not about seeking financial compensation (Option 1) for their labor, as the primary objective was to achieve freedom, not monetary compensation. They also were not primarily about requesting better living conditions on plantations (Option 2), although improved living conditions might have been a secondary concern. Moreover, the idea of advocating for the expansion of slavery (Option 4) contradicts the fundamental purpose of these petitions, which was to end the institution of slavery.
In conclusion, freedom petitions were a crucial part of the broader movement for emancipation in New England and were instrumental in pushing for the legal recognition of enslaved individuals' right to freedom.
Learn more about Freedom
#SPJ11
the answer is:
(sharia law)
Answer:
Hernán Cortés!
Explanation:
Cortés razed Tenochtitlan, building his own capital over its ruins, and proclaimed the Aztec Empire to be New Spain. Soon after the Spanish colonization of Cuba in 1519, a small army led by Hernán Cortés conquered Mexico from the Aztecs.
Answer:
The Union Cause
Explanation:
Sullivan Ballou was an advocate, politician and officer of the Union Army during the Civil War. Ballou was always involved in public causes and was a strong supporter of Union Cause and Abraham Lincoln. He is known for the beautifully written letter he wrote to his wife before he died in the First Battle of Bull Run.
Answer:
False. In order to understand Shang China, we do not solely rely on artifacts because we can actually read some of the ancient Chinese writings from that time period. The Shang Dynasty, which lasted from approximately 1600 to 1046 BCE, was known for its use of oracle bones. These were bones or turtle shells that were inscribed with ancient Chinese characters, and they were used for divination purposes. By studying these inscriptions, archaeologists and historians have been able to gain valuable insights into the religious beliefs, social structure, and political system of Shang China.
In addition to oracle bones, other forms of ancient Chinese writings have also been discovered, such as bronze inscriptions and bamboo manuscripts. These texts provide further information about various aspects of Shang society, including rituals, governance, and literature. By combining the information gleaned from these ancient writings with the analysis of artifacts, archaeologists and historians have been able to reconstruct a more comprehensive understanding of Shang China.
Therefore, while artifacts are important sources of information about Shang China, we can indeed rely on ancient Chinese writings to deepen our knowledge of this ancient civilization.
Explanation:
Answer: They allowed a small rural population to provide food for a large urban population.
Explanation: Large urban populations typically didn’t farm for their food, so they had smaller rural populations to grow it for them, which benefited both parties, as the smaller rural area got more money, and the larger urban area got access to more foods.