Two landscapers must mow a rectangular lawn that measures 100 feet by 200 feet. Each wants to mow no more than half of the lawn. The first starts by mowing around the outside of the lawn. How wide a strip must the first landscaper mow on each of the four sides in order to mow no more than half of the lawn? The mower has a 24-inch cut. Approximate the required number of trips around the lawn.
Answers
Answer 1
Answer:
The total area of the complete lawn is (100-ft x 200-ft) = 20,000 ft².
One half of the lawn is 10,000 ft². That's the limit that the first man
must be careful not to exceed, lest he blindly mow a couple of blades
more than his partner does, and become the laughing stock of the whole
company when the word gets around. 10,000 ft² ... no mas !
When you think about it ... massage it and roll it around in your
mind's eye, and then soon give up and make yourself a sketch ...
you realize that if he starts along the length of the field, then with
a 2-ft cut, the lengths of the strips he cuts will line up like this:
First lap:
(200 - 0) = 200
(100 - 2) = 98
(200 - 2) = 198
(100 - 4) = 96
Second lap:
(200 - 4) = 196
(100 - 6) = 94
(200 - 6) = 194
(100 - 8) = 92
Third lap:
(200 - 8) = 192
(100 - 10) = 90
(200 - 10) = 190
(100 - 12) = 88
These are the lengths of each strip. They're 2-ft wide, so the area
of each one is (2 x the length).
I expected to be able to see a pattern developing, but my brain cells
are too fatigued and I don't see it. So I'll just keep going for another
lap, then add up all the areas and see how close he is:
Fourth lap:
(200 - 12) = 188
(100 - 14) = 86
(200 - 14) = 186
(100 - 16) = 84
So far, after four laps around the yard, the 16 lengths add up to
2,272-ft, for a total area of 4,544-ft². If I kept this up, I'd need to do
at least four more laps ... probably more, because they're getting smaller
all the time, so each lap contributes less area than the last one did.
Hey ! Maybe that's the key to the approximate pattern !
Each lap around the yard mows a 2-ft strip along the length ... twice ...
and a 2-ft strip along the width ... twice. (Approximately.) So the area
that gets mowed around each lap is (2-ft) x (the perimeter of the rectangle),
(approximately), and then the NEXT lap is a rectangle with 4-ft less length
and 4-ft less width.
So now we have rectangles measuring
(200 x 100), (196 x 96), (192 x 92), (188 x 88), (184 x 84) ... etc.
and the areas of their rectangular strips are
1200-ft², 1168-ft², 1136-ft², 1104-ft², 1072-ft² ... etc.
==> I see that the areas are decreasing by 32-ft² each lap.
So the next few laps are
1040-ft², 1008-ft², 976-ft², 944-ft², 912-ft² ... etc.
How much area do we have now:
After 9 laps, Area = 9,648-ft²
After 10 laps, Area = 10,560-ft².
And there you are ... Somewhere during the 10th lap, he'll need to
stop and call the company surveyor, to come out, measure up, walk
in front of the mower, and put down a yellow chalk-line exactly where
the total becomes 10,000-ft².
There must still be an easier way to do it. For now, however, I'll leave it
there, and go with my answer of: During the 10th lap.
The total area of the complete lawn is (100-ft x 200-ft) = 20,000 ft².
One half of the lawn is 10,000 ft². That's the limit that the first man
must be careful not to exceed, lest he blindly mow a couple of blades
more than his partner does, and become the laughing stock of the whole
company when the word gets around. 10,000 ft² ... no mas !
When you think about it ... massage it and roll it around in your
mind's eye, and then soon give up and make yourself a sketch ...
you realize that if he starts along the length of the field, then with
a 2-ft cut, the lengths of the strips he cuts will line up like this:
First lap:
(200 - 0) = 200
(100 - 2) = 98
(200 - 2) = 198
(100 - 4) = 96
Second lap:
(200 - 4) = 196
(100 - 6) = 94
(200 - 6) = 194
(100 - 8) = 92
Third lap:
(200 - 8) = 192
(100 - 10) = 90
(200 - 10) = 190
(100 - 12) = 88
These are the lengths of each strip. They're 2-ft wide, so the area
of each one is (2 x the length).
I expected to be able to see a pattern developing, but my brain cells
are too fatigued and I don't see it. So I'll just keep going for another
lap, then add up all the areas and see how close he is:
Fourth lap:
(200 - 12) = 188
(100 - 14) = 86
(200 - 14) = 186
(100 - 16) = 84
So far, after four laps around the yard, the 16 lengths add up to
2,272-ft, for a total area of 4,544-ft². If I kept this up, I'd need to do
at least four more laps ... probably more, because they're getting smaller
all the time, so each lap contributes less area than the last one did.
Hey ! Maybe that's the key to the approximate pattern !
Each lap around the yard mows a 2-ft strip along the length ... twice ...
and a 2-ft strip along the width ... twice. (Approximately.) So the area
that gets mowed around each lap is (2-ft) x (the perimeter of the rectangle),
(approximately), and then the NEXT lap is a rectangle with 4-ft less length
and 4-ft less width.
So now we have rectangles measuring
(200 x 100), (196 x 96), (192 x 92), (188 x 88), (184 x 84) ... etc.
and the areas of their rectangular strips are
1200-ft², 1168-ft², 1136-ft², 1104-ft², 1072-ft² ... etc.
==> I see that the areas are decreasing by 32-ft² each lap.
So the next few laps are
1040-ft², 1008-ft², 976-ft², 944-ft², 912-ft² ... etc.
How much area do we have now:
After 9 laps, Area = 9,648-ft²
After 10 laps, Area = 10,560-ft².
And there you are ... Somewhere during the 10th lap, he'll need to
stop and call the company surveyor, to come out, measure up, walk
in front of the mower, and put down a yellow chalk-line exactly where
the total becomes 10,000-ft².
There must still be an easier way to do it. For now, however, I'll leave it
there, and go with my answer of: During the 10th lap.
Related Questions
What are the coordinates of point B in the diagram?
Need the values IN FRACTIONS (no mixed numbers or decimals)1. -1/2^12. -1/2^23. -1/2^34. -1/2^45. -1/2^5
Assume that all chickens have 3290 feathers . If it takes you 2.6 seconds to pluck 83.6 feathers , how many hours would it take you to defeat her 7256 chickens ? Answer in units of hours . If you can help me before 2 hours pass I will be so happy ! Thanks ,
The first term of an arithmetic sequence is 4 and the fifth term is 16. What is the nth term of the sequence?A. 4n B. 3n + 1 C. 5n – 1 D. 4n + 1
What is the equation of the line that passes through (-1, -7) and has a slope of 2?
Need the values IN FRACTIONS (no mixed numbers or decimals)1. -1/2^12. -1/2^23. -1/2^34. -1/2^45. -1/2^5
Assume that all chickens have 3290 feathers . If it takes you 2.6 seconds to pluck 83.6 feathers , how many hours would it take you to defeat her 7256 chickens ? Answer in units of hours . If you can help me before 2 hours pass I will be so happy ! Thanks ,
The first term of an arithmetic sequence is 4 and the fifth term is 16. What is the nth term of the sequence?A. 4n B. 3n + 1 C. 5n – 1 D. 4n + 1
What is the equation of the line that passes through (-1, -7) and has a slope of 2?
decreases
remains the same,
Answers
the answer to this i increases.
The answer is Increases!
Answers
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is B that’s the right answer
Question 7 options:
45°
65°
115°
135°
Save
Answers
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
If the lines g and h are parallel
then
-----> by alternate exterior angles
see the attached figure to better understand the problem
we have that
therefore
parallel means m1 = m2
so m2=45
so m2=45
D
4 cm
4 cm
square centimeters
Submit
??
Answers
Pretty sure it’s 42.5 cm.
Answers
formula for surface area is
SA=(s^2)+4(1/2)(sl) or
SA=(s^2)+2(sl)
where s is side legnth and slant height is l
if s times 3
if l divided by 5
replace all s with 3s and all l with l/5 and compare wth original
SA=((3s)^2)+2(3s(l/5))
SA=(9s^2)+((6sl)/5)
SA=(s^2)+4(1/2)(sl) or
SA=(s^2)+2(sl)
where s is side legnth and slant height is l
if s times 3
if l divided by 5
replace all s with 3s and all l with l/5 and compare wth original
SA=((3s)^2)+2(3s(l/5))
SA=(9s^2)+((6sl)/5)
a. carbon chloride
b. nitrogen monoxide
c. copper (II) carbonate
d. chloric acid
Answers
Among the compounds given, the one that is not valid is a. carbon chloride. a compound composed of non-metals should have prefixes that is related to the number of atoms of the elements present. In this case, the other cmopounds are considered valid but not A
The correct answer is: Option (a) Carbon Chloride
Explanation:
Carbon has four valence electrons; therefore, it would require 4 more electrons to become stable. Chlorine, however, has seven (7) valence electrons. So it would require only one electron to become stable. In this case, as in the name, carbon chloride, the word chloride refers to the compound that is stable, which in this case cannot be possible (as carbon requires 4 electrons, and chlorine only has 7). If chlorine had 4 valence electrons, then it would be possible. Hence, the correct option is (a) Carbon Chloride.
Explanation:
Carbon has four valence electrons; therefore, it would require 4 more electrons to become stable. Chlorine, however, has seven (7) valence electrons. So it would require only one electron to become stable. In this case, as in the name, carbon chloride, the word chloride refers to the compound that is stable, which in this case cannot be possible (as carbon requires 4 electrons, and chlorine only has 7). If chlorine had 4 valence electrons, then it would be possible. Hence, the correct option is (a) Carbon Chloride.
Other Questions