V+1/2=-5/8 solve for v

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: v+\frac { 1 }{ 2 } =-\frac { 5 }{ 8 } \n \n v=-\frac { 5 }{ 8 } -\frac { 1 }{ 2 } \n \n v=-\frac { 5 }{ 8 } -\frac { 4 }{ 8 } \n \n v=-\frac { 9 }{ 8 }

Related Questions

PLEASE HELP! Shaquira is baking cookies to put in packages for a fundraiser. Shaquira has made 86 chocolate chip cookies and 42 sugar cookies.Shaquira wants to create identical packages of cookies to sell, and she must use all of the cookies.What is the greatest number of identical packages that Shaquira can make?
Find the area of the lateral faces of the right triangular prism with altitude of 5 cm and base edges of length 3 cm, 4 cm, and 5 cm.
What is 4/10 in simplest form
Jill had a certain amount of money. she spent 15$ downloading new songs. she has 2/5 of the original amount left. how much money did she have originally?
Teacher:Find the Slope and Y-interce1)x + 4y = 32slope =y-intercept =

What is the quotient of (x3 +3×^2-4x-12) ÷ (x^2 + 5x +6)

Answers

Below are the steps and answers

A restaurant manager needs to rope off a rectangular section for a private party. The length of the section must be 7.4 m. The manager can use no more than 23 m of rope. Which inequality could you use to find the possible widths of the roped off section

Answers

Answer:

14.8+2W\leq 23

The value of the width must be less than or equal to 4.1 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that

The perimeter of the rectangular section is given by

P=2L+2W

we have

L=7.4\ m

substitute

P=2(7.4)+2W

P=14.8+2W

Remember that

The manager can use no more than 23 m of rope

so

The perimeter must be less than or equal to 23 m

14.8+2W\leq 23

solve for W

subtract 14.8 both sides

2W\leq 23-14.8

2W\leq 8.2

divide by 2 both sides

W\leq 4.1\ m

The value of the width must be less than or equal to 4.1 meters

Are 124 and 741 relatively prime?

Answers

Yes 124 and 741 are relatively prime
Yes they very much are

Jacob is solving the equation below using successive approximations.2^x-4=3^-x-2 He started from a graph where he found the solution to be between 1 and 2. Using the lower and upper bounds from the graph, Jacob did the following work for the first iteration. Step 1 Rewrite the equation so that it equals zero on one side. Step 2 Evaluate the rewritten equation at the lower and upper bounds. To find the solution that lies between 1 and 2, set these values as the lower and upper bounds while finding the solution. Step 3 Take the average of the lower and upper bounds. Step 4 Evaluate the rewritten equation at x = . Step 5 Since this value is positive, replace the previous lower bound so that the bounds are now x = and x = 2. Where did Jacob make a mistake, and what was the error?

Answers

The mistake made by Jacob is; D: Jacob made a mistake at step 5. He should have used x=32 as the new upper bound.

How to Solve Successive Approximations?

In Mathematics, successive approximation can be defined as a classical method that is used in Calculus for solving integral equations or initial value problems.

In this question, Jacob started the first iteration of successive approximation by using the lower and upper bounds of the graph. However, we can deduce that Jacob made a mistake instep 5 because he should have used x = 3/2 as the new upper bound.

Read more about Successive Approximations at; brainly.com/question/25219621

#SPJ2

Answer:

For plato users

 

D. Jacob made a mistake at step 5. He should have used  x = 3/2   as the new upper bound.

Step-by-step explanation:

Tiffany is planning a vacation. The hotel costs $60 per night and her flight costs $220. Tiffany has $600 dollars to spend on the vacation. Given her budget and the trip costs, how many nights can she spend in a hotel? Let n represent the number of nights in the hotel.Which of the equations below best represents the situation?

Question 2 options:

600n - 220 = 60


22n + 600 = 60


60n + 600 = 220


60n + 220 = 600

Answers

Answer:

60n+220=600

Step-by-step explanation:

Write the fraction equivalent of each decimal 36.90

Answers

Answer:

36.90 = (369/10)