Brutus was a betrayer. He was a killer and a liar. Brutus killed Caesar as he stabbed him. Killing Caesar whom was his friend showed that he's not a good friend as he's a betrayer.
On the other hand, Brutus can be seen to be a patriot as he sacrificed his good friend and therefore saved Romans from the bad acts of Caesar. He showed that Romans came first even at the expense of killing his friends. Therefore, he's patriot.
Read related question on:
Here is what I wrote:
Brutus was a betrayer, not only by murdering his best friend Caesar, but because he claimed to do it for all the people of Rome, besides murdering someone should not be the only way for Rome to be a free country. Many people will argue that Brutus is a patriot because of his hard decisions to make and because he was trying to save Rome. However, these intentions don’t seem correct, you should not kill someone for a country to be free, and you should not kill anyone at all.
Answer:
In 1898, Louisiana added a grandfather clause to its voting laws which required voters to pass a literacy test or pay a poll tax unless their grandfathers had been eligible to vote before the Civil War. This was a discriminatory and racially biased policy aimed at disenfranchising African Americans and ensuring that they couldn't vote, as the majority of African Americans in the South did not have grandfathers who were eligible to vote before the Civil War due to slavery and racial discrimination. The grandfather clause was one of the many Jim Crow laws and practices that were implemented in the American South during the late 19th and early 20th centuries to restrict the voting rights and civil rights of African Americans.
the answer is b: the process for creating laws
violation of Free Speech.
The Sedition Act was indeed controversial because it restricted Free Speech during World War I. However, it was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court, who reasoned that restricting speech during wartime is necessary for national security.
The Sedition Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1918 during World War I. This act made it illegal to speak or write anything critical of the government, the military, or the war effort. It was indeed controversial because it was seen as a violation of Free Speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the act was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of Schenck v. United States in 1919. The court reasoned that during times of war, the government has the right to restrict speech that presents a clear and present danger to national security.
So, while the Sedition Act did limit Free Speech rights, it was considered acceptable under the circumstances of wartime. It was repealed in 1920 after the end of World War I and is often seen as an example of the tension between national security and civil liberties.
#SPJ6
Answer:
Focusing on economic reform during his time as Dictator for Life, Caesar improved land and waterways. His political reforms focused on creating physical structures, rebuilding cities and temples, and improving the Senate, The main ruling body in Rome.
Explanation:
Answer:
Julius Caesar granted citizenship to people living in Rome’s territory outside the Italian peninsula. He started colonies to give landless people land to farm. He ordered landowners who used slave labor to hire more free people to give jobs to unemployed people. All of these measures made Caesar popular with the poor people of Rome.
Explanation:
Brainliest plz!