A keyword should be just as confusing as the word you are trying to learn so you learn the concept better TRUE OR FALSE

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: It is false when a keyword should be just asconfusing as the word you are trying to learn so you learn the concept better.This will induce more confusion on the person who is studying. A keyword by theits meaning ‘key’ meaning it holds the password to answer to the question.Thus, the keyword must best describe the gist of the whole sentence orparagraph or topic you are reading or studying so that when the time ofrecalling comes, you will be easily transported back to the moment you word theword and understood its meaning.
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

false on e2020

Explanation:

just took the quiz


Related Questions

Pride and prejudice role of women
Which of the following sentences uses the word vague correctly?The sky was vague with clouds and smoke from the fire.The directions were too vague to help them find the meeting location.It is necessary to find out when they could be vague in order to achieve their goals.The speech was so vague that everyone clearly understood the purpose in the first five minutes.
Hamlet William Shakespeare Masterprose study questions 1. What mood is stressed at the outset of the play
Wihch is same relationship as baby:crib? bird:nest, table:chair, basement:mouse, hamburger:lettuce
Which one of the following is characteristic of a character study? A. The character comes to an unhappy end. B. Getting a glimpse into the character's mind and heart is the most important element of the story. C. The character is usually tragicomic that is, he or she is both funny and sad at different times. D. The protagonist is a static character.

Read the thesis statement below and answer the question that follows. While they impact the environment, recycling programs, emissions standards, and renewable energy development cannot reverse or stop the global warming problem. In which type of research paper would this thesis statement appear? A. analytical B. argumentative C. personal narrative D. how-to informational manual

Answers

Answer:

A. analytical

Explanation:

An analytical research is the type of quantitative research that involves a more in-depth evaluation of the information collected in a given observational or experimental study in an attempt to explain the context of a phenomenon. In this case, we try to explain strategies that do not reverse the global warming scenario.

A. analytical.
Because your are analyzing how they can not stop or reverse global warming

In “Ah, Are You Digging on My Grave?” by Thomas Hardy, what has happened to the dead woman’s widower?

Answers

The main subject matter of the poem “Ah, Are You Digging on My Grave?” by Thomas Hardy is the evaluation of Death in society.

Hardy considers Death as another part of human nature, therefore love neither aversion can't withstand it.

In the poem, the widower has remarried, "he went to wed one of the brightest wealth"; he moved on to a richer woman, he's marrying someone else inasmuch as his wife is dead, thus he cannot longer annoy her.

He got married
"No, yesterday he went to wed."

Short for wedding

Read the sentence and answer the question below:The surreptitious, or secret, recordings made by the high school seniors resulted in several employees being fired for unlawful conduct.

In this sentence, what type of context clue provides the meaning of the word surreptitious?

Contrast
Restatement
Definition
Inference

Answers

The correct option for this question would be C. Definition

What did the Greek army do to infuriate Athena? They recaptured Helen. They did not kill Ajax after he attacked Cassandra. They destroyed her statue while sacking Troy. They forgot an important sacrifice.

Answers

They did not kill Ajax after he attacked Cassandra

They did not kill Ajax after he attacked Cassandra.



I not only want to do well on this test, but I also need to do well on this test.Which one of these rhetorical devices is used here?a. Personification
b. Appeal to ethos
c. Metaphor
d. Parallelism

Answers

the correct answer to this question is parallelism.

Jeffrey Dahmer admitted killing 15 young men. During his trial, the jurors considered his insanity plea. Wisconsin defines insanity using the Brawner rule, and the jurors decided that Dahmer was sane. What potentially caused the jurors to come to this conclusion?

Answers

Answer:

Dahmer was careful to kill his victims in a manner that minimized his chances of being caught suggesting that he recognize or appreciated that his behavior was bad/wrong and could control it

Explanation:The American Law Institute model stated that this kind of behaviour  called insanity can be referred to as an individual is not  accountable or responsible for criminal offence only  if at the time the crime/offence was committed as a result of mental disease/defect he lacks considerable/essential capacity to recognize the essence of his crime or restrict his conduct to the rule of law.it is largely known to be one of the slightest victorious and accomplishing defenses of a criminal defense case and it is a very  challenging work.

The Brawner rule states that:

"A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law."

Anyone could clearly see that the Milwaukee Monster had the mental capacity to have killed and raped that many people... According to an article published on "The New York Times" , Dahmer "Had taught himself to live behind a mask of normalcy that hid his often contradictory emotions.".

So yes, Dahmer had emotional problems -- but not ones that left him mentally  inept. Therefore, he was completely sane when he committed these grisly acts.