The Logging, Timber and Construction Industries would be the most affected
For obvious reasons, anyone employed in the logging industry would be severely affected if stricter laws were enforced regarding deforestation since less trees could be cut down compared to today's current quotas.
Secondly, those working in the Timber industry would also be immediately affected by the restricted availability of timber and wood in general.
Thirdly, the Construction industry, particularly in states where building structures are mostly wooden structures due to earthquakes, would suffer a tremendous pressure to remain competitive as Timber and wood prices would inevitably increase in price as availability decreases.
Answer:
finance companies
real estate developers
Explanation:
A Municipal Utility District or MUD is the political subdivision of Texas State which is controlled by the government of Texas and it functions to provide drainage, sewage, water and other services that are related to utilities within the MUD area.
All these utilities including public toilets and drainage systems are made and provided to the public with the financial help of the finance companies. They are created and developed by various real estate developers and construction companies. So these companies are likely to benefit most from MUDs.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, A point of Social Comparison.
Explanation:
Social comparison is a state in which a person compares their own worth in the society based by comparing themselves with others. They might compare them with people they consider better or worse than them. Sometimes the social comparisons can act as a catalyst for improving oneself, finding a role model and for self-motivation, but it more likely can create a complex.
Other times, people might become judgmental and even combative.
So in this example, when Ginny felt a bit insecure about her appearance after looking at the models in fashion magazines, the models actually carried out the function of Social Comparison.
The option which states the instance of government's laissez-faire approach is Congress votes down a law providing a loan to a failing car manufacturer. Thus, option 3rd is correct.
The laissez-faire strategy refers to the government's decision to leave the private sector alone and allow the market to drive economic expansion. To implement this strategy, the government must refrain from providing any kind of incentives to any of the market's rivals.
Laissez-faire refers to a policy of little government meddling in the financial issues of people and society. The Physiocrats, a school of economics that thrived in France, are typically linked to the laissez-faire philosophy. Hence, option 3rd is correct.
Learn more about laissez-faire approach here;
#SPJ2
Your question was incomplete, probably the complete question was....
During a strike, the government sends negotiators to work out a deal between the company and its workers. The government brings a court case against a telecommunications company that has a monopoly in the state of Colorado. Congress votes down a law providing a loan to a failing car manufacturer.
Answer:
The answer is: Congress votes down a law providing a loan to a failing car manufacturer. laissez-faire approach referst to government approach to leave the private sector alone and let the market direct the growth of the economy.
Explanation:
There.
Answer:
Push factors “push” people away from their home and include things like war. Pull factors “pull” people to a new home and include things like better opportunities.
Explanation:
The reasons people migrate are usually economic, political, cultural, or environmental. hope this helps you :)
Answer:The push factor of immigration is war and chaos and the pull factor of immigration is better opportunities
Explanation:
The correct answer is B.
If aiming to reduce inflation, the Federal reserve needs to decrease the money supply, which means reducing the amount of money in circulation in the economy. This is denominated a contractionary monetary policy.
If the money supplied decreases, the cost of borrowing (the cost of money) increases due to its increased relative scarcity. This, in turn, discourages borrowing, and produces a lower income, and a drop in demand, production, and employment. Therefore, it causes the economy to shrink as mentioned in the question.
As spending drops, so do prices and therefore inflation.
Such a strategy is only implemented when there are inflationary preassures, as it also brings important side effects in terms of output.
To control or reduce inflation, the Federal Reserve decreases the money supply. This increase in the purchasing power of the dollar reduces inflation but may also cause the economy to shrink due to less money available for spending and investment.
To reduce inflation, the Federal Reserve decreases the money supply. By limiting the amount of money in circulation, the purchasing power of the dollar increases, leading to a reduction in inflation. However, this can also cause the economy to shrink as it restricts economic growth, because less money is available for consumer spending and investment.
Looking at it from another angle: If the Federal Reserve increases the money supply, it has the potential to spark inflation, because there is more money chasing the same quantity of goods and services. Therefore, to control or reduce inflation, the Federal Reserve actually decreases the money supply.
#SPJ6