James owns a home in lake tahoe, nevada, that he rented for $4,600 for 40 days during the summer. he lived there for a total of 120 days, and the rest of the year the house was vacant. the expenses for the home included $6,000 in mortgage interest, $900 in property taxes, $1,300 in maintenance and utilities, and $2,500 in depreciation. what is his net income or loss from the rental of his home (without considering the passive loss limitation)? use the irs method for allocation of expenses. $0. $1,925 net income. $4,600 net income. $6,100 net loss.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

3682 money ;) sfegsdfffffffffffffffffffffffffff


Related Questions

SCENARIO:Marcus, feeling stressed out from work, decided to search for a meditation app for his phone that would help him relax during the day. One app, CalmDown, appeared to be promising. It didn't have any reviews yet and looked to be a brand-new app, so he decided to try it out. He downloaded the app to his phone and opened it up. The first screen required he enter in his name and email address. At the very bottom of the screen it had some small writing, but Marcus didn't notice it and hit the continue button.Had Marcus clicked on the link at the bottom of the screen, he would have seen the following:The second screen stated "Three-day trial version- Free! $59.99 annual fee thereafter." Marcus was annoyed that the app would cost him almost $60 but figured he would set a reminder on his phone to cancel the app before the trial period expired so he wouldn't get charged. Plus, he wanted to see the app in action. If it was actually worth the price, he wouldn't mind paying the annual fee. He clicked "Continue" and put in his bank card information on the next screen. The following screen asked Marcus a series of questions about his stress level and what he felt caused stress in his life. He clicked "high" and "work" as the level and cause. He then completed the first CalmDown meditation in the app, but was not impressed with its functionality. Deciding he would cancel his subscription immediately, he went into the profile settings to try to find the cancel option but couldn't. He searched every possible place on the app but didn't see a way to cancel the subscription. Marcus decided to try to find the app's developer through their website, but a quick search didn't turn up anything. Already stressed and becoming more frustrated, Marcus decided to contact the app store. They informed him that he should be able to go into his app store account and cancel the subscription there. However, when Marcus went there, he didn't see the app as an option or as a subscription. Thinking that maybe his subscription didn't process, he just deleted the app from his phone.Marcus didn't give the app or the subscription any more thought, becoming increasingly more distracted by the amount of stress at work. Four months later, Marcus was looking at his bank account online and noticed it was lower than it should have been. He began reviewing the charges and noticed multiple charges for $59.99 to a merchant named "CDgotU." He immediately remembered the app and contacted his bank to dispute the charges. His bank replied that due to the charges being debit withdraws he needed to dispute them within 2 days of being made. Moreover, if he had been diligent about watching his account, they could have put a block on the account and the remaining fraudulent charges would have been prevented. The bank representative also told him that he should try to get a refund from the company that charged him. After making his case with the bank representative for several hours about how he tried to cancel his subscription, he was unsuccessful. The bank's representative was able to provide Marcus a phone number attached to the Merchant account, but when Marcus called the number it was disconnected. The bank could not provide him with any additional information such as a company address or website.After more internet searching, Marcus saw a number of other complaints online about the app, and noticed it had been removed from the app store and was no longer available for download. Marcus decided to bring an action against the company for fraud, breach of contract, conversion, and several other claims in his home state of Vermont.Can Marcus compel the bank or the app store to provide additional information about the creator of CalmDown in order to determine the creator's location and potential assets?a. No, these records are not subject to being subpoenaed due to their confidential nature. b. Yes, he can subpoena records during the discovery process from both, but the bank and the app store may ask the judge to deny the request or limit the request due to privacy concerns. c. Yes, but he must subpoena these records prior to the filing of the complaint. d. Yes, he can file interrogatories during the discovery process to both the bank and the app store.
Hayes Corp. is a manufacturer of truck trailers. On January 1, 2021, Hayes Corp. leases ten trailers to Lester Company under a six-year non-cancelable lease agreement. The following information about the lease and the trailers is provided: 1) Annual payment of $120,175 is due on January 1, 2021 and at December 31 from 2021 to 2025. Hayes Corp. has an implicit rate of 8% (present value factor for 6 periods at 8% is 4.99271). 2) Titles to the trailers pass to Lester at the end of the lease. 3) The fair value of each trailer is $60,000. The cost of each trailer to Hayes Corp. is $54,000. Each trailer has an expected useful life of nine years. 4) Collectibility of the lease payments is probable. Instructions (a) What type of lease is this for the Lester Company and Hayes Corp? (b) Prepare a lease amortization schedule for Lester Company till 12/31/2021. (c) Prepare the journal entries for Lester Company on 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2021. Round all amounts to the nearest dollar.
Name a time you believe you applied the utility maximization rule. What were the goods or services you chose to maximize your utility? How did this relate to your budget constraint?
Plush Corporation purchased 100 percent of Common Corporation’s common stock on January 1, 20X3, and paid $450,000. The fair value of Common’s identifiable net assets at that date was $430,000. By the end of 20X5, the fair value of Common, which Plush considers to be a reporting unit, had increased to $485,000; however, Plush’s external auditor made a passing comment to the company’s chief accountant that Plush might need to recognize impairment of goodwill on one or more of its investments.Prepare a memo to Plush’s chief accountant indicating the tests used in determining whether goodwill has been impaired. Include in your discussion one or more possible conditions under which Plush might be required to recognize impairment of goodwill on its investment in Common Corporation.In preparing your memo, review the current accounting literature, including authoritative pronouncements of the FASB and other appropriate bodies. Support your discussion with citations and quotations from the applicable literature.
Logistics Solutions provides order fulfillment services for dot merchants. The company maintains warehouses that stock items carried by its dot clients. When a client receives an order from a customer, the order is forwarded to Logistics Solutions, which pulls the item from storage, packs it, and ships it to the customer. The company uses a predetermined variable overhead rate based on direct labor-hours. In the most recent month, 120,000 items were shipped to customers using 2,300 direct labor-hours. The company incurred a total of $7,360 in variable overhead costs. According to the company's standards, 0.02 direct labor-hours are required to fulfill an order for one item and the variable overhead rate is $3.25 per direct labor-hour. Required: 1. What variable overhead cost should have been incurred to fill the orders for the 120,000 items? How much does this differ from the actual variable overhead cost? 2. Break down the difference computed (1) above into a variable overhead rate variance and a variable overhead efficiency variance.

Stephanie manages the accounting department at an advertising agency. She needs to conduct performance appraisals for the eight employees in her department. Stephanie wants a performance appraisal tool that is highly accurate, ranks employees, and uses critical incidents to help explain ratings to appraisees. Which performance appraisal tool is best suited for Stephanie?

Answers

Answer:

The correct answer is behaviorally anchored rating scale.

Explanation:

The behavior-based rating scale is a performance appraisal method that combines elements of the traditional rating scale and critical incident methods.  In this, various levels of performance are presented along with a scale that describes them regarding the specific work behavior of an employee.

The following data from the just completed year are taken from the accounting records of Mason Company: Sales$658,000 Direct labor cost$83,000 Raw material purchases$135,000 Selling expenses$106,000 Administrative expenses$46,000 Manufacturing overhead applied to work in process$202,000 Actual manufacturing overhead costs$224,000 InventoriesBeginningEnding Raw materials$8,800$10,200 Work in process$5,900$20,500 Finished goods$74,000$25,100 Required: 1. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured. Assume all raw materials used in production were direct materials. 2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods sold. Assume that the company's underapplied or overapplied overhead is closed to Cost of Goods Sold. 3. Prepare an income statement.

Answers

Answer:

1. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured

schedule of cost of goods manufactured

Direct labor cost                                        $83,000

Raw Materials                                           $133,000

Manufacturing overhead                         $202,000

Add Beginning Work In Process                 $5,900

Less Ending  Work In Process                 ($20,500)

cost of goods manufactured                    $403,400

2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods sold

schedule of cost of goods sold

Begining Finished goods                       $74,000

Add cost of goods manufactured        $403,400

Less Ending Finished goods                 ($25,100)

Add Under- Applied Overheads           $22,000

cost of goods sold                                $473,300

3. Prepare an income statement.

Sales                                                      $658,000

Less cost of goods sold                       ($473,300)

Gross Profit                                            $184,700

Less Operating Expenses

Selling expenses                                  ($106,000)

Administrative expenses                      ($46,000)

Net Income                                             $ 32,700

Explanation:

1. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured

Raw Materials Consumed in Production

Begining Raw Materials Inventory              $8,800

Add Raw material purchases                   $135,000

Less Ending Raw Materials Inventory      ($10,800)

Raw Materials Consumed in Production $133,000

schedule of cost of goods manufactured

Direct labor cost                                        $83,000

Raw Materials                                           $133,000

Manufacturing overhead                         $202,000

Add Beginning Work In Process                 $5,900

Less Ending  Work In Process                 ($20,500)

cost of goods manufactured                    $403,400

2. Prepare a schedule of cost of goods sold

Actual manufacturing overhead costs ($224,000) > Applied Manufacturing overhead($202,000)

Under- Applied Overheads

Applied Manufacturing overhead        $202,000

Actual manufacturing overhead costs $224,000

Under- Applied Overheads                    $22,000

schedule of cost of goods sold

Begining Finished goods                       $74,000

Add cost of goods manufactured        $403,400

Less Ending Finished goods                 ($25,100)

Add Under- Applied Overheads           $22,000

cost of goods sold                                $473,300

3. Prepare an income statement.

Sales                                                      $658,000

Less cost of goods sold                       ($473,300)

Gross Profit                                            $184,700

Less Operating Expenses

Selling expenses                                  ($106,000)

Administrative expenses                      ($46,000)

Net Income                                             $ 32,700

JFK Corp. factors $300,000 of accounts receivable with LBJ Finance Corporation on a without recourse basis on July 1, 2020. The receivables records are transferred to LBJ Finance, which will receive the collections. LBJ Finance assesses a finance charge of 1.5% of the amount of accounts receivable and retains an amount equal to 4% of accounts receivable to cover sales discounts, returns, and allowances. The transaction is to be recorded as a sale. a) Prepare the journal entry on July 1, 2020, for JFK Corp. to record the sale of receivable without recourse
b) Prepare the journal entry on July 1, 2020, for LBJ Finance Corporation to record the purchase of receivables without recourse.

Answers

Answer:

Please see below

Explanation:

A. Journal entry for JFK Corp, July 1, 2020 to record the sale of receivable without recourse.

Cash. Dr.

[(100 - 4 - 1.5) × 300,000]. $283,500

Due from factor Dr

(0.4 × 300,000) $12,000

Loss on sale of receivable. Dr

(0.015 × 300,000) $4,500

To Accounts receivable Cr $300,000

B. Journal entry for LBJ finance Corporation on July 1, 2020 to record the purchase of receivables without recourse.

Accounts receivable Dr $300,000

To due from factor Cr $12,000

To Financing revenue Cr $4,500

To cash account Cr $283,500

Final answer:

J.F.K. Corp. would record the sale of receivables without recourse by debiting Accounts Receivable, Finance Charge Revenue, and Sales Discounts, Returns, and Allowances, and crediting Factoring Cost. LBJ Finance Corporation would record the purchase of receivables without recourse by debiting Accounts Receivable and crediting Factoring Revenue.

Explanation:

a) The journal entry for J.F.K. Corp. to record the sale of receivables without recourse on July 1, 2020, would be:

Accounts Receivable: $300,000
Finance Charge Revenue: $4,500 (1.5% of $300,000)
Sales Discounts, Returns, and Allowances: $12,000 (4% of $300,000)
Factoring Cost: $283,500

b) The journal entry for LBJ Finance Corporation to record the purchase of receivables without recourse on July 1, 2020, would be:

Accounts Receivable: $300,000
Factoring Revenue: $283,500 (calculating the net amount received after deducting finance charges and sales discounts, returns, and allowances)
 

Learn more about Journal entries for the sale and purchase of receivables without recourse here:

brainly.com/question/34621789

#SPJ3

Before prorating the manufacturing overhead costs at the end of 2020, the Cost of Goods Sold and Finished Goods Inventory accounts had applied overhead costs of $59,300 and $38,000 in them, respectively. There was no Work-in-Process at the beginning or end of 2020. During the year, manufacturing overhead costs of $92,000 were actually incurred. The balance in the Applied Manufacturing Overhead was $97,300 at the end of 2020. If the under or overapplied overhead is prorated between Cost of Goods Sold and the inventory accounts, how much will be allocated to the Finished Goods Inventory

Answers

Answer:

$2069

Explanation:

Given

Applied overhead costs of Goods sold = $59,300

Applied overhead cost of finished goods = $38,000

Overhead Balance = $97,300

Overhead Cost = $92,000

Overapplied Overhead = Overhead Balance - Overhead Cost

Overapplied Overhead = $97,300 - $92,000

Overapplied Overhead = $5,300

Allocated Amount = (Applied Overhead * Finished Goods /(Overapplied Overhead)

Allocated Amount = ($5,300 * $38,000) ($59,300 + $38,000)

Allocated Amount = ($5,300 * 38,000) (97,300)

Allocated Amount = $2069

Answer:

The over applied overhead which is allocated to finished goods inventory is $ 1,488.54

Explanation:

Determination of over or under applied overhead

Applied Manufacturing overhead                                      $ 97,300      

Actual factory overhead incurred                                      $ 92,000

Overapplied manufacturing overhead                              $    5,300

Allocation of over applied overhead is on basis of values in Cost of goods sold and Finished goods inventory.

Cost of goods Sold                     $ 59,300

Finished Goods inventory          $ 38,000

Sum of COGS and Inventory      $ 97.300

Over applied Overhead      $ 5,300

Allocation Finished Goods inventory

$38,000/ $ 97,300 * $ 5,300 = $ 1,488,54

Allocation Cost of Goods sold

$ 59.300/ $ 97,300  * $ 5,300 = $ 3.811.46

During the past year a company had total fixed costs of $700,000. Its product sold for $93 per unit. Variable costs during this time equaled $45 per unit. Next year the company is anticipating a 10% increase in total fixed costs and a $3 per unit decrease in variable costs, but would like to maintain its current selling price per unit. How many units must the company sell next year to earn $1,000,000. (Round answer to complete units.)

Answers

Answer:

The company must sell 34706 units

Explanation:

To calculate the units required to earn a target profit of $1000000 next year, we will use the break even analysis modified for target profit calculation.

The break even in units is calculated by dividing the Total fixed costs by the contribution margin per unit. To calculate the units required for target profit, we add the target profit amount to the fixed cost and divide it by the contribution margin per unit. Thus, the formula is,

Units required for target profit = (Total fixed cost + target profit) / Contribution margin per unit

Where contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit

New fixed costs = 700000 + 700000 * 0.1 = 770000

New variable cost = 45 - 3 = 42

New contribution margin per unit = 93 - 42 = $51

Units required for target profit = (770000 + 1000000) / 51

Units required for target profit = 34705.88 rounded off to 34706 units

Loki, Inc. and​ Thor, Inc. have entered into a​ stock-swap merger agreement whereby Loki will pay a 39% premium over​ Thor's pre-merger price. If​ Thor's pre-merger price per share was $42 and​ Loki's was $51​, what exchange ratio will Loki need to​ offer?

Answers

Answer: 1.15

Explanation:

Premium = 39%

Thor's share price = $42

The compensation to shareholders will be:

= $42 + ($42 × 0.39)

= $42 + $16.38

= $58.38

Loki's share price = $51

We then calculate the exchange ratio which will be:

= $58.38 / $51

= 1.15

Loki will need to offer an exchange rate of 1.15.