Which improves air circulation in forced air heating? A, radiation b, conduction, c, convection

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Convection

Explanation:

As we know that in convection mode of heat transfer the medium molecules is transferred from one part to other part along with the thermal energy stored with them.

Here when heat is given to the medium then due to temperature gradient density of medium will change and this will lead to a movement of medium particles from higher density to lower density region.

This is known as convection mode of heat transfer and this mode of heat transfer can be increased by forced convection of medium particles.

So here air circulation in forced heating is an example of CONVECTION

Answer 2
Answer:

The answer for "Which improves air circulation in forced air heating?" is C. Convection


Related Questions

Kaya collects the data shown in the table. What is the resistance in the circuit? 0.05 1.8 5.7 20
The moon has the greatest effect on earth's...... (1) year (2) seasons (3) ocean tides (4) daylight hours
A 10 kg bear is running to the right at 10 m/s. He crashes into another 10 kg bear running to the left at -5 m/s. They collide and stick together, and move on together at 2.5 m/s. Write at least 2 or 3 sentences explaining whether momentum was conserved in this situation.
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 30 POINTS!What is the magnitude of a nanometer?10–3 m10–6 m10–9 m10–12 m
Which tool would you use to measure the height of a cube of metal

Which force best represents Fg?

Answers

The weight of a barbell acting on a weightlifter in 80 N represents Fg.

Explanation:

Force exerted due to earth's gravity is represented as Fg. The gravitational pull is experienced by the mass of object has some force attached to by it which is called as force due to gravity.

The force is dependent upon the mass of the object experiencing the force. Hence the weight of a barbell acting on a weightlifter 80 N is the best example for Fg.

Answer:

The weight of a barbell acting on a weightlifter in 80 N represents Fg.

Explanation:

How do fission nuclear reactions differ from fusion nuclear reactions? Fission reactions involve the conversion of matter into energy, but fusion reactions do not. Fusion reactions involve the conversion of matter into energy, but fission reactions do not. Fission reactions are used to generate electricity for consumers, but fusion reactions are not. Fusion reactions are used to generate electricity for consumers, but fission reactions are not.

Answers

How do fission nuclear reactions differ from fusion nuclear reactions?

A. Fission reactions involve the conversion of matter into energy, but fusion reactions do not.

B. Fusion reactions involve the conversion of matter into energy, but fission reactions do not.

C. Fission reactions are used to generate electricity for consumers, but fusion reactions are not.

D. Fusion reactions are used to generate electricity for consumers, but fission reactions are not.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Both fission and fusion are nuclear reactions that produce energy, but their applications differs.

 Fission is the splitting of a large (heavy, unstable) nucleus into smaller ones, and fusion is the process where nuclei of small atoms are combine together to form the nuclei of larger atoms releasing vast amounts of energy.

The correct answer is c. Fission reactions are used to generate electricity for consumers, but fusion reactions are not.

The physics of fusion is the process that makes the sun shine, and that makes the hydrogen bomb explode.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Relate balanced and unbalanced forces to net forces

Answers

Answer:If the forces on an object are balanced, the net force is zero.

Explanation:

If the forces are unbalanced forces, the effects don't cancel each other. Any time the forces acting on an object are unbalanced, the net force is not zero, and the motion of the object changes.

What is the most important reason that caffeine (C8H10N4O2) has a lower melting point than copper (II) chloride (CuCl2)?A. The intermolecular forces holding the caffeine molecules together are weaker than the ionic bonds in CuCl2.
B. The heavy caffeine molecules are more likely to fall apart than the lighter CuCl2 molecules.
C. The metallic bonds in copper chloride are stronger than the ionic bonds in caffeine.
D. Caffeine is a network solid and has a low melting point like other network solids.

Answers

Answer:

                Option-A " The intermolecular forces holding the caffeine molecules together are weaker than the ionic bonds in CuCl₂ ".

Explanation:

                         There are two types of interactions among the atoms and molecules. One are known as intramolecular forces while the other are known as intermolecular forces.

Examples of Intramolecular forces are ionic bonds and covalent bonds e.t.c. while examples of intermolecular forces are hydrogen bond interactions, dipole-dipole interactions e.t.c.

Remember that intramolecular forces ar far more greater in strength than the intermolecular forces. Hence, in given statement the interactions between Caffeine molecules are intermolecular forces while, that between Cu and Cl ions in CuCl₂ are intramolecular forces.

I need to answer questions for a project I would really appreciate it if anybody can take the time out their day to answer these questions in the most reasonable waysPlease DO NOT ANSWER IF YOU DONT KNOW I really need the grade for this project and I’ll give 30 points and I’ll mark brainliest the person with the most reasonable answers

Answers

Answer:

so jump iin the air

Explanation:

lol

Why there will be a change in the sole of the shoes after using many days?

Answers

Answer:

See the explanation below

Explanation:

Due to the frictional force, this force acts in the opposite direction to the movement of the person's shoe. This force tends to wear the sole of any shoe. We must remember that the frictional force is defined as the product of the normal force by the coefficient of friction between surfaces.

For this case, it should be the coefficient of dynamic friction between the pavement and the material of the sole of the shoe