Jenny is either a hippie or an artist. But Jenny is certainly not a hippie. So it can be concluded that Jenny is an artist.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

In the question it is given that jenny is either a hippie or an artist .so there are two possibilities for jenny .

Further it is given that jenny is certainly not a hippie therefore one possibility is ruled out of being a hippie so we left with only one i.e. jennny being a artist.

So we can conclude that jenny is an artist

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

there is only 1 reasonable answer.


Related Questions

Lydia has money in two savings accounts. One rate is 7% and the other is 13%. If she has $300 more in the 13% account and the total interest is $252, how much is invested in each savings account?
In the game of tic-tac-toe, if all moves are performed randomly the probability that the game will end in a draw is . Suppose six random games of tic-tac-toe are played. What is the probability that at least one of them will end in a draw?
Hello can you please help me posted picture of question
What percent is equivalent to 2/366 1/3 66 3/5 66 2/3 66 7/10
How do you do a question like this? 80% as a fraction in simplest form.

Suppose that det(a) = a b c d e f g h i = 2 and find the determinant of the given matrix. a b c −4d −4e −4f a + g b + h c + i

Answers

I'll go out on a limb and suppose you're given the matrix

\mathbf A=\begin{bmatrix}a&b&c\nd&e&f\ng&h&i\end{bmatrix}

and you're asked to find the determinant of \mathbf B, where

\mathbf B=\begin{bmatrix}a&b&c\n-4d&-4e&-4f\na+g&b+h&c+i\end{bmatrix}

and given that \det\mathbf A=2.

There are two properties of the determinant that come into play here:

(1) Whenever a single row/column is scaled by a constant k, then the determinant of the matrix is scaled by that same constant;

(2) Adding/subtracting rows does not change the value of the determinant.

Taken together, we have that

\det\mathbf B=-4\det\mathbf A=-8

Final answer:

Due to insufficient information, we cannot calculate the determinant of the given matrix. The determinant calculation varies based on the matrix's size and the specifics of its elements.

Explanation:

The question asked was to find the determinant of a given matrix when the det(a) = 2. However, the information provided is insufficient to determine the actual matrix determinant due to numerical errors and unrelatable data. The determinant of a matrix is calculated differently depending on the type of matrix. For a 2x2 matrix, if the matrix is [a b; c d], the determinant would be 'ad - bc'. For a 3x3 matrix, the determinant process involves more steps including finding minors and cofactors of matrix elements. However, without the actual specifics of the matrix, the determinant cannot be calculated.

Learn more about Determinant of a matrix here:

brainly.com/question/32638141

#SPJ11

Peyton already has 15 dollars. Every hour (x) that she works at the corner store, she earns another 3 dollars (y). How many total dollars will Peyton have after 15 hours of work?

Answers

Answer:

$60 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

x axis is hours spent and y axis is $3 + dollars earned so 15*3 =45 +15 = 60

i believe the answer is $60

bananas cost $0.80 a pound. in a relation, the input is the number of pounds of bananas and the output is the cost.

Answers

Yes because one input (number of pounds of banana) will always have the same output (cost).

Answer:

True. This isn't really a question but it is a statement

Step-by-step explanation:

1 pound       80 cents

2 pounds     1.60

3 pounds     2.40

and so on

This is a scale drawing of an apartment. The actual apartment has a perimeter of 160 ft. Draw another scale drawing of the apartment using the scale 20 ft to 1 unit from the apartment to the drawing. EXPLAIN your reasoning.

Answers

The attached drawing is the apartment using the scale 20 ft to 1 unit from the apartment to the drawing.

As the perimeter lies along the edges of squares and we count 16 sides of squares as we work around the perimeter,

this means that each square is

160 / 16 = 10 ft on a side.

so 10 ft in real life plots to 1 unit on the drawing

If the scale is changed to 20 :1 ,

then the drawing would be exactly the same shape, only each side would have half the original drawing units.

In stead of a 40 ft side being represented by 40 ft / 10 ft/unit = 4 units,

That side would be 40 ft / 20 ft/unit = 2 units

Hence, The attached drawing is the apartment using the scale 20 ft to 1 unit from the apartment to the drawing.

Learn more about perimeter here:

brainly.com/question/397857

#SPJ3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

As the perimeter lies along the edges of squares and we count 16 sides of squares as we work around the perimeter, this means that each square is

160 / 16 = 10 ft on a side.

so 10 ft in real life plots to 1 unit on the drawing

If the scale is changed to 20 :1 , then the drawing would be exactly the same shape, only each side would have half the original drawing units.

In stead of a 40 ft side being represented by 40 ft / 10 ft/unit = 4 units, That side would be 40 ft / 20 ft/unit = 2 units

A bell tower casts a 60 cm shadow. At the same time a sculpture that is 4.5 meters tall casts a 15 cm shadow. How tall is the bell tower

Answers

Answer: 18

Step-by-step explanation:

x/4.5= 60/15

15x=270

X = 18cm

If f(x) = -1/x, then f'(x) = 1/x^2. Theorem seems to suggest that the integral from -1 to 1 of 1/x^2 dx would equal f(1) - f(-1) = -1 -1 = -2. But 1/x^2 is a positive function and so its integral over [-1,1] should be positive. What is wrong here?

Answers

Answer:

The flaw is at x=0 where the function is not defined

Step-by-step explanation:

For any function we have

F(x)=\int f(x)dx

The integral can be evaluated only if the function f(x) is defined in the interval [a,b] in which this integral is evaluated

In our our case function f(x) is not defined at x=0 in the interval [-1,+1] thus this results in the flaw that we have obtained in the reasoning