Use Euler’s Method: ????????????????=???? ????????????????=−????????−????3+????cos(????) ????(0)=1.0 ????(0)=1.0 ????=0.4 ????=20.0 ℎ=0.01 ????=10000 ▪ Write the data (y1, y2) to a file named "LASTNAME_Prob1.dat" Example: If your name is John Doe – file name would be "DOE_Prob1.dat" ▪ Plot the result with lines using GNUPLOT (Hint: see lecture 08) ▪ Submit full code (copy and paste). Plot must be on a separate page. ▪ Run the code again and plot the result for: ????=0.1 ????=11.0

The annual quantity of welded assemblies that would have to be produced to reach the break-even point for the two methods is approximately 15,983.

To determine the break-even point between the manual arc welding cell and the robotic cell, we need to calculate the total costs for each method and then equate them.

For the manual arc welding cell:

Labor cost per hour = (welder's hourly rate x arc-on time) + (fitter's hourly rate x fitter's participation in the cycle) = ($30 x 0.25) + ($25 x 0.3) = $11.25

Labor cost per welded assembly = labor cost per hour x cycle time per assembly / 60 = $11.25 x 15.4 / 60 = $2.89

Overhead cost per welded assembly = (labor cost per hour x (1 - arc-on time - fitter's participation in the cycle)) x cycle time per assembly / 60 = ($30 x 0.45) x 15.4 / 60 = $4.68

Total cost per welded assembly = labor cost per welded assembly + overhead cost per welded assembly = $2.89 + $4.68 = $7.57

Total cost per hour = total cost per welded assembly x production rate = $7.57 x 8 = $60.56

Total cost per year = total cost per hour x hours of operation per year = $60.56 x 2,000 = $121,120

For the robotic arc welding cell:

Labor cost per hour = fitter's hourly rate x fitter's participation in the cycle = $25 x 0.62 = $15.50

Labor cost per welded assembly = labor cost per hour x cycle time per assembly / 60 = $15.50 x 15.4 / 60 = $3.97

Overhead cost per welded assembly = power and utility cost per hour + annual maintenance cost / production rate = $3.80 + $3,500 / (8 x 2,000) = $3.80 + $0.22 = $4.02

Total cost per welded assembly = labor cost per welded assembly + overhead cost per welded assembly + (installed cost / (production rate x service life)) = $3.97 + $4.02 + ($158,000 / (8 x 3)) = $3.97 + $4.02 + $6,208.33 = $14.19

Total cost per hour = total cost per welded assembly x production rate = $14.19 x 8 = $113.52

Total cost per year = total cost per hour x hours of operation per year = $113.52 x 2,000 = $227,040

To find the break-even point, we set the total cost of the manual arc welding cell equal to the total cost of the robotic arc welding cell and solve for the annualquantity of welded assemblies:

$121,120 + x($7.57) = $227,040 + x($14.19)

$7.57x - $14.19x = $227,040 - $121,120

$-6.62x = $105,920

x = $105,920 / $6.62

x = 15,982.7

Therefore, the annualquantity of welded assemblies that would have to be produced to reach the break-even point for the two methods is approximately 15,983.

Learn more about hourly rate here brainly.com/question/29335545

#SPJ4

Answer:

Decrease to typical from utilizing lambda-decrease:  

The given lambda - math terms is, (λf.λx.f(f(fx)))(λy.y×3)2

The of taking the terms is significant in lambda - math,  

For the term, (λy, y×3)2, we can substitute the incentive to the capacity.  

Therefore apply beta-decrease on “(λy, y×3)2,“ will return 2 × 3 = 6  

Presently the tem becomes, (λf λx f(f(fx)))6

The main term, (λf λx f(f(fx))) takes a capacity and a contention and substitute the contention in the capacity.  

Here it is given that it is conceivable to substitute, the subsequent increase in the outcome.  

In this way by applying next level beta - decrease, the term becomes f(f(f(6))), which is in ordinary structure.

Answer:

// Program is written in C++

// Comments are used to explain some lines

// Only the required function is written. The main method is excluded.

#include<bits/stdc++.h>

#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

int divSum(int num)

{

// The next line declares the final result of summation of divisors. The variable declared is also

//initialised to 0

int result = 0;

// find all numbers which divide 'num'

for (int i=2; i<=(num/2); i++)

{

// if 'i' is divisor of 'num'

if (num%i==0)

{

if (i==(num/i))

result += i; //add divisor to result

else

result += (i + num/i); //add divisor to result

}

}

cout<<result+1;

}

In this exercise, using the knowledge of computational language in C++, we have that this code will be written as:

The code is in the attached image.

We can write the C++  as:

#include<bits/stdc++.h>

#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

int divSum(int num)

{

int result = 0;

for (int i=2; i<=(num/2); i++)

{

if (num%i==0)

{

if (i==(num/i))

result += i; //add divisor to result

else

result += (i + num/i); //add divisor to result

}

}

cout<<result+1;

}

See more about C++ at brainly.com/question/19705654

Answer:

The change in specific internal energy is 3.5 kj.

Explanation:

Step1

Given:

Total change in energy is 15.5 kj.

Change in kinetic energy is –3.5 kj.

Change in potential energy is 0 kj.

Mass is 5.4 kg.

Step2

Calculation:

Change in internal energy is calculated as follows:

kj.

Step3

Specific internal energy is calculated as follows:

kj/kg.

Thus, the change in specific internal energy is 3.5 kj/kg.

Answer:

V₂=1.76 m³

P=222.03 KPa

Explanation:

Given that

For tank 1

V₁=1 m³

T₁= 10°C = 283 K

P₁=350 KPa

For tank 2

m₂=3 kg

T₂=35°C = 308 K

P₂=150 KPa

We know that for air

P V = m R T

P=pressure ,V= Volume,R= gas constant ,T= temperature ,m =mass

for tank 2

P₂ V₂ = m₂ R T₂

By putting the values

150 x V₂ = 3 x 0.287 x 308

V₂=1.76 m³

Final mass = m₁+m₂

m =m₁+m₂

The final volume V= V₂+V₁

V= 1.76 + 1 m³

V= 2.76 m³

The final temperature T= 19.5°C

T= 292.5 K

m =m₁+m₂

m =4.3 + 3 = 7.3 kg

Now at final state

P V = m R T

P x 2.76 = 7.3 x 0.287 x 292.5

P=222.03 KPa

Answer:

B) gate-source junction is reverse-biased

Explanation:

FET is described as an electric field that controls the specific current and is being applied to a "third electrode" which is generally known as "gate". However, only the electric field is responsible for controlling the "current flow"   in a specific channel and then the particular device is being "voltage operated" that consists of high "input impedance".

In FET, the different "charge carriers" tend to enter a particular channel via "source" and exits through "drain".