LAW COLLEGE

One day, police officers were involved in a high-speed chase through city limits after a driver sped through a school zone. When they finally caught up with the driver, the police immediately arrested Betty at the scene. Because Betty was arrested at the scene and without a warrant, the court may hold a hearing during the first appearance to determine whether there was probable cause to arrest her. This hearing is known as:

a. Richardson hearing
b. Allen hearing
c. Lewis hearing
d. Gerstein hearing

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

d. Gerstein hearing

Explanation:

Gerstein hearing is a process of hearing in which a court may summon an individual over criminal charges based on probable cause. The procedure of charging an individual with a criminal suit through a reasonable belief that the arrested individual is a potential criminal is called probable cause.

An individual may be summoned by a court for a Gerstein hearing even without a warrant to determine whether there was a probable cause to arrest his/her.

Related Questions

Roles of ethics on the national development show citation per page three page
4. Escola, a waitress, was injured when a bottle of soda exploded in her hand while she was putting it into the restaurant's cooler. The bottle came from a shipment that had remained under the counter for thirty-six hours after being delivered by the bottling company. The bottler had subjected the bottle to the method of testing for defects commonly used in the industry, and there is no evidence that Escola or anyone else did anything to damage the bottle between its delivery and the explosion. Escola brought an action against the bottler for damages. Since she is unable to show any specific acts of negligence on its part, she seeks to rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she be able to recover on this theory? Explain.
What is the default join type?
In the United States v. Park, was this corporate executive defendant held criminally liable for failing to ensure the company's compliance with the law?a. That the defendant could not be held liable because it could not be proven by a reasonable doubt that he knew warehouse employees were failing to take proper steps to ensure sanitary conditionsb. That the defendant could not be held liable because it could not be proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he knew warehouse employees were failing to take proper steps to insure sanitary conditionsc. That the defendant could not be held liable because he did not personally cause the contaminationd. That the defendant could be held liable because he hid evidence of the offensese. That the defendant could be held liable because he failed to see that those delegated the duty to ensure sanitary conditions did their job
22.Which federal department is instrumental in setting foreign policy? А. the Department of the Treasury B. the Justice Department C, the Department of Defense D the State Department E the Department of the Interior

The state of Arizona has just passed a mandatory seat belt law that will require anyone traveling in Arizona to put on his/her seat belt. Several travelers from other states that do not have such seat belt laws have brought suit challenging the constitutionality of the Arizona law as an undue burden on interstate commerce. What test will the court apply in reviewing the statute

Answers

Answer:

The Balancing test.

Explanation:

Developing appropriate attitudes depends on recognizing that attitudes are _. A. Not necessary
B. A waste of time
C. Important

Answers

important. correct me if i’m wrong. love ya!!

Which of the following guidelines should a supervisor follow to create and maintain a harassment-free workplace? (Select all that apply.)A.
Know, publicize and enforce the district’s sexual-harassment policy and complaint procedure.
B.
Identify potential problems and address them promptly.
C.
Address only confirmed incidents of sexual harassment.
D.
Help resolve issues that stem from sexual-harassment acts and allegations.
E.
Serve as a role model to others.

Answers

Answer:

A. Know, publicize and enforce the district’s sexual-harassment policy and complaint procedure.

D.Help resolve issues that stem from sexual-harassment acts and allegations.

Explanation:

For a supervisor to have a harassment-free workplace, he would be most wise to follow these two steps listed which are publicizing the district’s anti-harassment policy and how to properly complain.

The next step would be to help resolve issues that stem from sexual harassment, both the deeds and allegations.

Liz files a suit against Moe in a state court. The case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. If Liz decides to appeal to a state appellate court, Liz's attorney must file, with the clerk of the appellate court within a prescribed period of time.a. Trueb. False

Answers

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The Supreme Court made provisions that allow any party who is not very satisfied with a decision he or she got from the high court in any civil case to appeal to the court of appeal.

The court stipulates the Notice of Appeal in form 112, which must be filled within thirty-days from the time of the judgment or order they hope to appeal against. The appellant has to provide security for the respondent at the time of filling this appeal in form 112.

How has the supreme court’s original interpretation of the right to privacy changed because of griswold and roe?

Answers

Answer:

Hi im Sergeant von im here too help!!.The Supreme Court's original interpretation of the right to privacy has changed because of Griswold and Roe by increasing and expanding the right to privacy. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life. Hope this answer helps.

Answer: This was the sample response

The Supreme Court has increased or expanded the right to privacy. Originally, the right applied to the privacy of one's own thoughts and the freedom to be left alone. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life.

Explanation:

Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the "Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

The Restatement(Second) of Contracts is a general principles of contract common law.

Promissory Estoppel is a legal principle in contract law that stops a person on breaking the promise.

Courts forr promissory Estoppel mentioned in Restatement(Second) of Contracts because "Restatement" is the law and is frequently referred to.

Other Questions

The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:A. RemediationB. The adjudicationC. The auditD. The inquiry

When the Constitution entitles all citizens to “due process” of law, what does this phrase mean?It is C) Every citizen has the right to a trial

A new law is established in the town of Avery that promotes affirmative action employment for people trans-gender and homosexual individuals. This law would be in pursuance of the tenets of the __________ school of jurisprudential thought.

WILL MAKR BRAINLIESTPerson A is riding on a bus. Person B walks up to person A, and pulls out a knife, then says "Get out of MY seat or I'll stab you." What crimes, if any, have been committed? (Refer to legislation)