What was vomitorium used for?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Vomitorias are believed to be places, where Romans were vomiting during parties so that they were able to continue feasting. It's not true.

In fact 
Vomitorium was an exit in amphitheatres, stadiums or hippodromes, which allowed big crowds to exit after the games/play has ended. Vomitorias are still present in modern buildings.
The name Vomitorium comes from Latin word vomō, which means "to spew forth".

Related Questions

How did major political parties affect elections
What was the court’s dissenting opinion on Plessy v. Ferguson?
Who was the first person to walk in the moon
Which of the following statements about agriculture is true
This image is from an envelope in the mid-1800s.Study it, and then answer the question.What does it say about cotton?a.It ruled the US economy.b.It ruled factory production.c.It ruled the Southern economy.

How was France different from Great Britain when it came to advancing the Industrial Revolution?

Answers

Great Britain and France were comparable in 1700; both had established commerce, trade and a handicraft industry. However, by 1900 there were noticeable differences between these two nations due to the nature in which each of them advanced in the process of the Industrial Revolution that is the name given to the transition to new manufacturing processes begun in Great Britain in 1760 to1840.

In such transition from hand production methods to machines, new chemical manufacturing, iron production processes as well as the increasing use of steam power, which characterized Industrial Revolution, France was different from Great Britain.

First, unlike in France in Great Britain aristocrats and landowners supported the pursuit of increasing in agricultural productivity, reason why Great Britain had a number of major technological innovations than France such as the improved land draining techniques. As a consequence of the described before productivity was one third higher in England than France.

Second, coal had become the most in demand fuel  not only in Britain but also in France, however in the latter coal resources were discovered in inconvenient locations far from cities or waterways which caused that transport costs for coal were quite higher in France that in Great Britain.

In addition, the railway developed in Britain by 1830, connecting Manchester and Liverpool, providing fastest distribution of goods with 10,500km of railway line open while France only had 3,000km open.  

Finally, either in Britain or in France during the 18th and 19th centuries, there was a dramatic increase in population size, whose benefit were related to an increase in the supply of labor However, population growth was much larger and faster in Britain

In conclusion, when it came to advancing the Industrial Revolution, despite France was an industrial power, Britain was leading industrial nation.  

How did Islam influence the government of the Mughal Empire?O
A. Late Mughal leaders' intolerance of non-Muslim citizens
weakened the empire.
O
B. Mughal sultans were subservient to Muslim priests called grand
viziers.
O
C. Mughal laws were administered by Muslim advisers called
ulemas.
O
D. Early Mughal emperors forced Sunni Muslims to become Shia
Muslims.

Answers

Late Mughal leaders' intolerance of non-Muslim citizens weakened the empire is the way Islam influence the government of the Mughal Empire.

What religion was Mughal?

The emperors, who were all patrilineally descended from Timur, the Sunni Turkish conquistador of Central Asia, all claimed to be Muslims.

Within what he believed to be the authentic Islam, each Mughal emperor created his own religious ideas and practice

Thus, option A is correct.

For more details about Mughal, click here:

brainly.com/question/1344262

#SPJ2

Answer:

A)Late mughal leaders' intorlerance of non-Muslim citizens weakened the empire.

How did the Nazis set the jews apart?​

Answers

Answer:

Germanys Nuremberg laws

Explanation:

Who was primarily responsible for negotiating the terms of the Compromise of 1850

Answers

The person that was primarily responsible for negotiating the terms of the Compromise of 1850 was Henry Clay, American Lawyer and a politician.

Which of the following statements is FALSE?a.
Even with Reconstruction efforts after the Civil War, Texas still fell short of funds and had to borrow money to cover the shortfall.
b.
Governor Davis and other radical Republicans opposed government participation in railroad construction.
c.
Manufacturing became more profitable than agriculture to Texas’ economy after the Civil War.
d.
Construction of the railroad improved Texas’ economy and transportation of goods and people.

Answers

Answer: B

Explanation: The Reconstruction era was the period in American history which lasted from 1863 to 1877. It was a significant chapter in the history of American civil rights.

The term has two applications: the first applies to the complete history of the entire country from 1865 to 1877 following the American Civil War; the second, to the attempted transformation of the 11 former Confederate states from 1863 to 1877, as directed by Congress, and the role of the Union states in that transformation. Reconstruction ended the remnants of Confederate secession and abolished slavery, making the newly freed slaves citizens with civil rights ostensibly guaranteed by three new constitutional amendments.

Hope it helps!

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Only 10% of Texans earned their living from farming before the Civil War.

It said that over 95% of Texans earned their living from farming

How did time prove that the purchase of Alaska was not an act of folly

Answers

United States purchased Alaska in 1867 and at first this action was regarded as a folly act on the part of William Seward who reached an agreement with the emperor Alexander II from Russia to purchase said land. Russia was in an adverse economic situation, so in order to avoid lossing Alaska in a conflict with Britain, they decided to sell the lands to the United States. Time proved that purchasing of Alaska was not an act of folly because it is a land rich in timber, minerals and oil.